Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Rosario be our F-Back?


Snake

Recommended Posts

I've never been even remotely impressed with Rosario's blocking. I'd rather not depend on him as a lead blocker.

Valid point, though "F-Back" in this system isn't quite a traditional fullback, if that's what you're thinking. It's more of just another word for "H-Back".

Hoover would have been a good choice for a lot like that a few years back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm assuming your talking more of an H-Back ala Cooley in Washington. I'm not sure he's really physical enough to be much more than a strictly pass catching TE.

H-back is used more for blocking then a F-back is. We used H-backs all the time with Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

H-back is used more for blocking then a F-back is. We used H-backs all the time with Fox.

More so under Henning than Davidson though. Henning was a Coryell guy.

One of the big deals on this offense will be creating mismatches as much as possible. If you think Rosario is capable of that, he's your guy.

(jury's still out for me)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More so under Henning than Davidson though. Henning was a Coryell guy.

One of the big deals on this offense will be creating mismatches as much as possible. If you think Rosario is capable of that, he's your guy.

(jury's still out for me)

Well I am not saying he is great but he has solid hands and speed. His blocking is not as bad as everyone makes out either. For that position I think he is the most complete. Barndige is weak at blocking and king is to slow to line up at WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...