Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Daniel Jeremiah’s . Final draft


Recommended Posts

If they actually do draft Graham, I hope the expectation isn't that he'll come in and dominate day 1. It'll likely to 2-3 seasons to see anything close to his final version. He might make some splash plays here and there, but he wouldn't likely dominate as a rookie. Derrick Brown dominated in the SEC and it took him until his 3rd season to look anything remotely like the player they thought they were getting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Shotgun said:

What if BPA is Jeanty? You take him at 8?

if your BPA at #8 is Jeanty then ideally  trade back a few spots try to get a 2nd or even an extra 3rd .picks #9 - #12 really like Jeanty 

& if they want to low ball ( fleece) you since they already know you will more than likely not draft Ashton Jeanty then screw it go ahead & call therir bluff & draft AJ then just sit back & watch them get in a bidding war to acquire his rights 

& that very least /worse case scenario keep Jeanty & Hubbard & just run the ball down the opponents throat

...just saying BPA 

 

Edited by bandu
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Shotgun said:

Yep, BPA sounds good in theory but doesn't exist in reality. 

it does not exist now because we try to draft for need/fit on a team that has holes everywhere

everyone talks about how great Marty Hurney was in the first round & if you go back & look the one thing that made Marty Hurney so good in the first round was he always took BPA.

& here is another more recent example of BPA Dan Morgan drafted BPA just last season when he traded up in the 2nd  for an injured RB that was the BPA at the time on most big boards

 

Edited by bandu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good game so far.  Solid trench battles, two young well built defenses, and my 2 fave coaches.  Stafford is really damn good.  SEA OL is overperforming.  
    • Okay then. To me that means Russell Wilson was Coryell. Because I see the proposition completely in the Russell Wilson punt/pass put it up for grabs mold. Count on the receiver to catch it or knock it down.    And the reason I thought that was the intent with Legette is the abysmal downfield game from 2023. As in, there was barely any.   I look at it as if… the result of a deep attempt isn’t as important as the opponent understanding they have to defend it. So I was all for some 50/50s. Coryell, Walsh whoever.  I do favor the Coryell approach personally but also very much value versatility, it doesn’t have to be strict. Just make the defense defend the whole field, however you do it. It has to include downfield throws.     
    • Sold, or in the process of being sold. Could be either way. Consider this for a second... Last season, our defensive coordinator steered what many have called the worst defense in NFL history.  Canales would absolutely have been justified in firing him, and no one would have blamed him if he had.  But what did he do? He gave Evero another chance to come back and prove he could be better. Does that tell us something about Canales? I think it does. Now apply that to Bryce 😕
×
×
  • Create New...