Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 College Football Thread

Joe Bear

By Joe Bear,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, CRA said:

GT with 3 fumbles last year.  2 already tonight and making life easy for Colorado.  Neither forced. 

And despite that CU is only up 7-0 with GT knocking on the door of the redzone. With a quick strike opening score and two gifted turnovers they've really blown a golden opportunity to blow this game wide open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

And despite that CU is only up 7-0 with GT knocking on the door of the redzone. With a quick strike opening score and two gifted turnovers they've really blown a golden opportunity to blow this game wide open.

Yep.  GT with 3 straight turnovers and then backed up on the 1 for the start of the 4th series.  Colorado blew the gifts overall 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Hugor Hill said:

App St game just got really sloppy. Charlotte just committed 3 turnovers in their last 4 possessions, and App St has had 2 def players ejected from targeting the last 2 defensive drives.  

I think the college targeting rule (or really the punishment) is the worst in all of sports.  I’d didn’t see these hits but ejection for simply any hit that meets the definition of targeting is just too harsh for me.   

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hugor Hill Community Regular

Hugor Hill

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think the college targeting rule (or really the punishment) is the worst in all of sports.  I’d didn’t see these hits but ejection for simply any hit that meets the definition of targeting is just too harsh for me.   

The hit on Harrell I could see because the player launched into him after he had fumbled the ball and really knocked his azz out. The one before to me, was iffy. If they only had lifted their helmets level and not lowered them, neither one would have been called. Its about fundamentals. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think the college targeting rule (or really the punishment) is the worst in all of sports.  I’d didn’t see these hits but ejection for simply any hit that meets the definition of targeting is just too harsh for me.   

Yeah, the penalty is one thing but the automatic ejection seems too much but people would be hollering if it was left up to ref discretion so I get it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CanadianCat
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By CanadianCat · Posted

      Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • Panthering
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By Panthering · Posted

      This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • tukafan21
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...