Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2025 College Football Thread


Joe Bear
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Stumpy said:

It's actually pretty simple. You just place one hand perpendicular over the other.

And, no, they lost the game directly because they had no time to answer GTs score. Patently obvious it was the wrong choice. 

 PLENTY of reasons to be critical of Dabo.    Plenty of reasons why they lost.  That coaching there at the end was fine.  You can’t let outcome dictate if it was big picture good decision making to put them in that really tight spot with a career kick.  It’s football.  Players play.  They pulled it off. 

You can blast Clemson for what did during those 4 quarters and leading into the season.  That’s where the game was actually lost 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

 PLENTY of reasons to be critical of Dabo.    Plenty of reasons why they lost.  That coaching there at the end was fine.  You can’t let outcome dictate if it was big picture good decision making to put them in that really tight spot with a career kick.  It’s football.  Players play.  They pulled it off. 

You can blast Clemson for what did during those 4 quarters and leading into the season.  That’s where the game was actually lost 

Honestly this was more about Tech they controlled the game and are the better team.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Honestly this was more about Tech they controlled the game and are the better team.

Clemson has the most talent in the ACC.  Just not a good football team.   Dabo knew last year he didn’t have a run game and he didn’t solve that easy problem.  Cade needs a strong run to work off of.  Not having that just messes up the whole thing.  Clemson DL living off those that came before them too.   Woods and Parker just ain’t what has been there.  I mean they good but just don’t as good as advertised 

GT has the best QB in the ACC

I might be a Clemson fan but I called Clemson and the Gamecocks going down today.  Both look overrated at this stage.  I think like LG said Clemson probably a bottom ish top 25 team when all said and done.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They probably do. Who are you thinking? And I'm gonna LMAO if you say Carson Beck. LOL 

Beck is a douche, but he's significantly better than Haynes.  

Haynes is an incredible athlete playing QB.  

It would be like saying The Golden Calf of Bristol was a better QB than Matthew Stafford when they were both in school.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, HeelsPanthersCanes said:

say what ...

Name someone better? 

and I’m not talking about NFL prospect and how they project at the next level.  Straight up best college QB in the ACC is the GT kid. 

being just a great college QB is a thing.  And you can be better QB than dudes suited to be better at the next level.   Take a Cam, Cam was a better college QB than almost any name you would pull out of a hat of dudes that were better in the pros 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HeelsPanthersCanes said:

Beck is a douche, but he's significantly better than Haynes.  

Haynes is an incredible athlete playing QB.  

It would be like saying The Golden Calf of Bristol was a better QB than Matthew Stafford when they were both in school.

Beck is more talented but I'd take Haynes all day everyday. Was The Golden Calf of Bristol a better college QB than Stafford? Yes, he was. Absolutely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, HeelsPanthersCanes said:

Beck is a douche, but he's significantly better than Haynes.  

Haynes is an incredible athlete playing QB.  

It would be like saying The Golden Calf of Bristol was a better QB than Matthew Stafford when they were both in school.

The Golden Calf of Bristol was a better college QB than Matt Stafford.   Stafford was a SIGNIFICANTLY better pro prospect and it played out that way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They know within 15 mins.  Many moons ago skins drafted Heath Shuler at like 5th overall and Gus Frerotte in the late rounds. You know the plan, its Heaths team. Old OLman stink said within 15 minutes they knew Gus was the better QB.  I didn't need 15 or players on the same field, I just knew like Bill said "he better walk on water", which he hasn't. I do blame tepper mainly for it, he spend the greater part of 2 year telling everyone Watson would be a panther......and fail....but a great fail...then Stanford turned panthers down.....tepper was beyond pissed and wanted a QB. He forced the trade and picked BY......and now by .....some grace of the gods formed a team with 4 QBs of no hope...... insane given the other roster spots.....
    • He definitely knows nothing about the Panthers, but there’s no denying he’s a pioneer in this whole draft grading and mock draft field.
    • I actually say wait five years since that's long enough to know if a player  became something worthy enough for a long term contract, whether with their original team or someone else. Therefore... 1 (8): Jaycee Horn - Has been questions about his durability but when he's healthy, he plays at a high level. Should we have drafted Pat Surtain or Micah Parsons, however? Arguably could’ve done better, but he's still here so that's a W pick. 2 (59): Terrance Marshall - Yet another classic Panther WR bust. I don’t recall seeing anything in his college tape that made me excited about drafting him in the first place.  3 (70): Brady Christensen - Proved to be a versatile player on the O-line.  As of now, we haven’t signed him back and I feel that we should. That's enough to say he was a solid draft pick. 3 (83): Tommy Tremble - Hasn't emerged as a consistent productive player, but he's had his moments here and there. We can certainly do better, but we haven’t found that guy yet so he still has some utility. W because he's not Ian Thomas. 4 (126): Chuba Hubbard - Surprise of the draft. It took time, but he's now our lead back.  5 (158): Daviyon Nixon - Had a half a sack with us and... that's it. I think I liked what I saw but it didn't pan out. 5 (166): Keith Taylor - Another guy I liked but only stuck around for two years. Played for a few other teams but nothing really to note. 6 (193): Deonte Brown - I really thought this guy was going to be a steal. He might’ve been the guy that had weight issues and never really got a handle on it. 6 (204): Shi Smith - He scored double the touchdowns that Marshall did in his short time here; it was two. Yeah, the Panthers wide receiver history is rather bleak. 6 (222): Thomas Fletcher - I had to look it up but he was a long snapper. JJ Jansen is immortal, so it was a wasted draft pick. 7 (232): Phil Hoskins - Actually recorded a sack here in his short career. Wish I could remember it.   Surprisingly not a bad draft when you have two good/great starters and a JAG that's still here, plus a good rotation guy most would like to keep. 
×
×
  • Create New...