Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sporters reporters forecast Panthers record

raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
Just now, Waldo said:

Again you're stuck on blame and Im talking about the situation. Draft position absolutely has a part in QB decisions because it's part of what they are weighing hold/move from a 3rd year QB just like who is available i  the draft. There is zero milk and it's not about blame or fair or any other weighted arguments, it's just the situation and the business.

Are you OK? Your comprehension of what I am saying is well bellow your usual banter. 

The cost was paid because the Panthers thought he was worth it. It doesn't automatically mean he is or will be. That's what im saying. I could care less what the team gave up, that's on them. What matters now is if they have a qb going forward. They seem to think they do and have bet their future employment on it. I'm just an observer at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

The cost was paid because the Panthers thought he was worth it. It doesn't automatically mean he is or will be. That's what im saying. I could care less what the team gave up, that's on them. What matters now is if they have a qb going forward. They seem to think they do and have bet their future employment on it. I'm just an observer at this point. 

the real question with most sports teams often, is who believes in who.   generally speaking, in house, there isn't always agreement on things.....but decisions get made and company lines get trotted out. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
Just now, CRA said:

the real question with most sports teams often, is who believes in who.   generally speaking, in house, there isn't always agreement on things.....but decisions get made and company lines get trotted out. 

 

That's all PR. You can't buy into what's said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

The cost was paid because the Panthers thought he was worth it. It doesn't automatically mean he is or will be. That's what im saying. I could care less what the team gave up, that's on them. What matters now is if they have a qb going forward. They seem to think they do and have bet their future employment on it. I'm just an observer at this point. 

Where they are picking in the upcoming draft when you have a QB entering his 4th year matters, not when you picked the 4th year QB. A team picking late would weigh options differently than a team picking top 10. That what I have been talking g about the entire time boss

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, CRA said:

Canales already talking about how doesn't want to give Hubbard too much work early this year.  Dude, look at your schedule.   You should be all in on winning early.  Which is why you should of been running a heavy preseason. 

He said that?

645412396_SuspiciousKenanThompsonGIF.gif.867850299fd6877b9821a2b63ea65a29.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Waldo said:

Where they are picking in the upcoming draft when you have a QB entering his 4th year matters, not when you picked the 4th year QB. A team picking late would weigh options differently than a team picking top 10. That what I have been talking g about the entire time boss

I have no idea what the team is thinking, boss, and neither do you. I have no idea what they will do or should do based on a hypothetical situation. We will find out when they get there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted

The only way that would make any level of sense is if Canales is just fully trying to put our third year #1 overall and pick and the passing offense in sink or swim scenarios early in the season. Because if you look back to the stat logs for that stretch of games where the offense looked "better" with Bryce. Chuba was more often than not the catalyst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I have no idea what the team is thinking, boss, and neither do you. I have no idea what they will do or should do based on a hypothetical situation. We will find out when they get there.

It's basically NFLing and I gave an example. I don't know what they are going to do but if the Bears can do it then other bottom dwellers can figure out the most basic concepts too. 

Edited by Waldo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
Just now, Waldo said:

It's basically NFLing and I gave an example. I don't know what they are going to do but if the Bears can't do it then other bottom dwellers can figure out the most basic concepts too. 

Teams are bottom dwellers for a reason.  We have been one for almost a decade now. Its not going to change overnight or with 1 single player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted

This is not the year to be mid. BY either has to be the guy or needs to pull a Jimmy Clausen and lead the Panthers to the #1 over pick.

It's just week 1, but QB draft can bounce back. 

Either way don't go 7-10, this needs to playoffs or lose all the games type of season. 

After that 23 points showing for all of PS and with thinking PS doesn't matter, it does if you are that bad.... 

This feel like 4 win team that spoils drafting #5 overall with a week 18 win, thus dropping into the teens with 5 total wins..

Talent and lack of elite coaching, just too much to over much unless the luck gods give the Panthers all they can.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, frankw said:

Ok yeah see my post above. I feel like that is a direct challenge to his starting QB.

I want Hubbard to have like 25 carries.  

4 of our 5 wins were basically the result of Hubbard being the primary cog of the O.   That’s how we win.  I don’t need Canales thinking week 18 is where he and Bryce needs thier heads  

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Teams are bottom dwellers for a reason.  We have been one for almost a decade now. Its not going to change overnight or with 1 single player.

That's where it starts but ownership has to stop making everything worse for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CBDellinger
      Maybe, Bryce is clutch.

      By CBDellinger · Posted

      Bruce Arians said when evaluating a college prospect they have to win on 3rd down and in the 2 min drill to be successful in the nfl.
    • TD alt
      Dane Brugler’s panthers mock pick

      By TD alt · Posted

      We took Luke when we had Jon Beason, and a hurt Jonathon Brooks when we had Chuba. Just noting.  I don't think teams are going to pass up on an impact player regardlessly if whether they need something else. There's a good argument that drafting an inferior player, and especially an obviously inferior player, based upon need is a pathway to failure.  I'm glad we took Tetairoa McMillan even though there were arguably bigger needs.
    • mav1234
      First 4 NFL starts - Tyler Shough

      By mav1234 · Posted

      As much as I'd love Cam or Mahomes I'd also settle for a QB that is at least better than average at something other than 4th quarter comebacks/game winning drives. He's literally bottom third in the league in most categories (yards, completion percentage, int percentage/turnovers, YPA, IAYPA, QBR and QB rating) and right around average in a couple others, notably TD % where he is 15th and YAC/PA where he is 9th. If Bryce can improve I'll be happy with him. But all this stuff about us asking for perfection / insane ability is a bit ridiculous. Most of us "haters" just see a QB that is basically below average over his career to date and has shown relatively little consistency in his third year.  NFL offenses don't need 400 yards every week at all, but they do require a QB that can move the ball, and Bryce struggles often with that (hence why our overall offensive rank is so bad despite an overall good rushing rank).
×
×
  • Create New...