Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Bringing in Newton for Visit


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

http://blogs.charlotte.com/panthers/

BOO YAH!

Most notably: A “few” of the 8-10 players the Panthers are targeting for their No. 1 pick are quarterbacks.

Rivera spoke glowingly of former Auburn quarterback Cam Newton, whom the Panthers plan to bring to Charlotte for a private visit. Other quarterback prospects also will be flown in, although Rivera did not specify which ones.

Rivera compared the 6-6, 250-pound Newton to several first-round quarterbacks who have had success.

“You look at the size of these guys. They're all big men. You look at Ben Roethlisberger, a Matt Ryan, a Joe Flacco. Cam's got those types of physical attributes,” Rivera said.

“He's a tall, powerful young man. He's got great athletic ability. He might be the better athlete of all of them (current QB prospects). But again, the one thing he does have is he's got a great arm. And he's a winner. You go back to his junior college and his college days, you can't pass that up, either. We've got to explore. There's eight, 9, 10 guys that we're looking at. We're going to explore all avenues with everybody.”

Rivera said the need for a franchise quarterback was part of his discussions with general manager Marty Hurney when Rivera was interviewing for the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a thread on this interview already, perhaps a merger is in order? or a subject change for the other thread and merger into this one?

http://reederstake.freedomblogging.com/2011/02/24/rivera-addresses-questions-about-no-1-pick-at-nfl-scouting-combines/8491/ has the full transcript, which is slightly less newton-favorable than the quips by the reporters, since he tends to stress looking at multiple players over and over.

Clear they like Newton's physical stats though, which is no surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marty Hurney and John Fox took LenDale White out to dinner just to talk privately to him...then drafted DeAngelo Williams.

Getting excited over pre-draft talk and shenanigans is kind of like getting hyped listening to your sister tell you about the blind date she set you up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want us to draft cam newton too but almost 60% of the questions dealt with Cam Newton. Ron Rivera is not John Fox and answers questions much more honestly and open which is why u heard his name more. I doubt he would have brought his name up as much if most of the questions werent about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

exactly, Salty.

There is a good chance he's the top QB they're looking at, but I caution everyone who wants him to not get too excited, because there is way too much time in the process left. He simply answers the questions put to him - and in a way to let other teams know if they want Cam Newton, they better consider the fact he may be gone even at #2. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...