Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Dowdle Mirage - Play Calling Problems


tukafan21
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, tukafan21 said:

Being happy about a win isn't giving up on them, but when people say things like, "we should just be happy after a win given how bad we've been the last 10 years", that's being happy regardless of how we looked because we don't get a lot of wins, which is straight up loser mentality.

And that's my point, 95% of the people happy about this win are also saying those kind of things.

I'm not upset that we won, I'm upset that we still didn't look good in key areas, namely play calling, if you can't see the difference between those things, then that's a you problem, not a me problem.

This win does NOTHING for us into the future, which is why it's hard for me to get exited over a win against another horrible team where we still didn't look good outside of a few big runs by Rico.  Trust me, if we turned some corner and looked great with Canales calling a great game to keep the Dolphins guessing wrong all day, then yea, I'd be on here celebrating it up, but that's not close to what happened.

Let me clear things up for you:

1.) I enjoy every win....regardless of circumstances.

2.) I've already conceded we have plenty of issues to solve in a previous post.  I have zero issues seeing that.

3.) Fans are allowed to join a win.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

It may not happen for a while. Really. It sure won't overnight. 

In the meantime, you can just constantly torture yourself with the overpowering angst and disgust for the team until it miraculously changes or not. Or you can get what enjoyment you can out of wins when they happen, if for no other thing than they lighten the load even for a moment, or perhaps go find a team that more fits your desired results. I mean, honestly, this is about you enjoying your life. If looking back over the last 30 years doesn't give you some at least moments of pride, then, well, you should know by now that it might be time to leave a relationship that's pretty abusive to you and your needs.

Best of the world to you, either way.

The irony here is interesting

You say the change won't happen overnight, so you're good with enjoying the wins despite not showing actual improvement.

You're right, it's not going to change overnight, which is why so many of us are rooting for seeing improvement right now over bad wins right now, because you have to start somewhere if you ever hope to improve.

Winning ugly doesn't help us in the future, but showing improvement would

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dpm0409 said:

Let me clear things up for you:

1.) I enjoy every win....regardless of circumstances.

2.) I've already conceded we have plenty of issues to solve in a previous post.  I have zero issues seeing that.

3.) Fans are allowed to join a win.

That's fair, but I've also never said you can't enjoy a win, there is a big difference between enjoying a win and sticking your head in the sand about our issues, which is what so many who are "just enjoying the win because of how bad we've been lately" are doing.

You can enjoy a win while also seeing the realities, and if you're a fan who can just enjoy those wins, more power to you.  But I'd prefer to see improvement over bad wins, and sure, I'd rather see wins and improvement in the same game, but if that's not an option, give me improvement in a loss over frustration in a win.

I genuinely don't understand why that's a controversial take, as I'm literally rooting for the thing that will help us contend faster, even if that won't be very fast.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, dpm0409 said:

You're saying you'd rather see us lose while showing improvements vs. win games....that's not the goal nor the recipe for contending faster.  If it were, we'd have won the damn Superbowl by now.....come on.

What?!?!?!

Yes it absolutely is, you're never going to get to contention if you never improve.

Winning 5-6 games a year because the other team was worse (not because you were better) does you no good in becoming a contending team, but improving as a coaching staff and as players 100% helps move the needle towards reaching a contending status.

I used this example all offseason, but just look back at the Lions like 5 years ago.  They kept losing, but were showing improvement in doing so, they went from I think (not looking it up) a 3 win team, to a 6 or 7 win team, to playing in the NFC Championship game in a span of 3 years.

They did it because in those 3 and 6/7 win seasons, they were showing improvement even in their losses, they weren't squeaking by in their wins while still looking terrible in key areas of the game.

THAT is what I'm asking for and why I'd rather see improvement over ugly wins, they are the literal example of what I'm looking for and now they're a true SB contender after picking 2nd in the 2022 draft.

And beyond all of that, your example of "we'd have won the SB right now" is also just nonsense that proves my point.  Because we haven't improved for years despite winning a handful of games each year because the other team was worse than we were.

So why haven't we actually gotten better in all that time yet when we've been winning games ugly instead of losing games while showing improvement?

You're literally proving yourself wrong with this post.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dpm0409 said:

You're saying you'd rather see us lose while showing improvements vs. win games....that's not the goal nor the recipe for contending faster.  If it were, we'd have won the damn Superbowl by now.....come on.

Quality of win matters. An example of absurdity. Would the team be more improved winning an entire season facing off against high school teams or losing against NFL teams. The answer is obvious. NFL teams would require more innovation, more ingenuity, more preparation, more work. That's why losing but improving your quality is more important than just winning without necessarily improving. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

The irony here is interesting

You say the change won't happen overnight, so you're good with enjoying the wins despite not showing actual improvement.

You're right, it's not going to change overnight, which is why so many of us are rooting for seeing improvement right now over bad wins right now, because you have to start somewhere if you ever hope to improve.

Winning ugly doesn't help us in the future, but showing improvement would

The question is, how can you tell which are just bad wins and which are good wins? Is there a measurable, quantitative way to do that or is it just "this fits my storyline" or "yeah, but it's not with the people I want to see it happen with"?

Back in the day, there were a lot of folks, believe it or not that couldn't stand seeing Cam Newton's ascension to a Super Bowl contender. They had all these criticisms but it really boiled down to something that didn't fit their view of how the game should be or how the world is supposed to work.

And then, there was 2003 when John Fox wasn't supposed to have changed a massive losing culture overnight working with a General Manager that came from a newspaper background and a metric butt ton of supposedly washed out free agents and nobodies. Heck, we had a big DE who they thought should have gone on to play basketball (he was a national champ there after all) AND he would have to sit out the beginning of the season for a PED violation. And there we were on the "no disrespect, but you ain't getting respect" tour that had us out gritting teams like the Rams and Eagles in the playoffs and just about sending  Brady home with a loss in the big dance. You know, we didn't deserve to be there in a lot of eyes. We were such nobodies that Muhsin Muhammad did the cover of SI posed with the shoosh don't tell thing because no one considered us anything but popcorn farts in the wind.

So, back to the thing... how do you, you personally, tell good wins from bad wins? Especially only five games into the season. 

Here's my take on why we have two good wins under our belt... building blocks. We kicked Atlanta's teeth in for our home opener. Any defeat of a divisional opponent is an important step in the right direction. If you can do that you are making strides. And with as weak as our division is, we need to be able to do it. And against Miami you had two teams hitting a crossroads at the same time. Both were heading somewhere: one trajectory up, one trajectory down... a loss could cost a coach their job, a win could extend their chances at seeing their vision through. We were kicked in the guts and should have died on the field, but managed to do the second biggest comeback in team history right then and there. To win. Any time you get a win like that, it's a good team-building win.

And it's about the team, isn't it. Look, I've criticized the heck out of Bryce and I'm still not sold on him, but a team doesn't have to win pretty for me to cheer their wins. They've just got to win and show some fight. Right now, they're doing that. 

We don't have a winning record yet, but we could break even this weekend. That means something. It really does. Win the next two and we would have a winning record for the first time since I don't know when. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

The question is, how can you tell which are just bad wins and which are good wins? Is there a measurable, quantitative way to do that or is it just "this fits my storyline" or "yeah, but it's not with the people I want to see it happen with"?

Back in the day, there were a lot of folks, believe it or not that couldn't stand seeing Cam Newton's ascension to a Super Bowl contender. They had all these criticisms but it really boiled down to something that didn't fit their view of how the game should be or how the world is supposed to work.

And then, there was 2003 when John Fox wasn't supposed to have changed a massive losing culture overnight working with a General Manager that came from a newspaper background and a metric butt ton of supposedly washed out free agents and nobodies. Heck, we had a big DE who they thought should have gone on to play basketball (he was a national champ there after all) AND he would have to sit out the beginning of the season for a PED violation. And there we were on the "no disrespect, but you ain't getting respect" tour that had us out gritting teams like the Rams and Eagles in the playoffs and just about sending  Brady home with a loss in the big dance. You know, we didn't deserve to be there in a lot of eyes. We were such nobodies that Muhsin Muhammad did the cover of SI posed with the shoosh don't tell thing because no one considered us anything but popcorn farts in the wind.

So, back to the thing... how do you, you personally, tell good wins from bad wins? Especially only five games into the season. 

Here's my take on why we have two good wins under our belt... building blocks. We kicked Atlanta's teeth in for our home opener. Any defeat of a divisional opponent is an important step in the right direction. If you can do that you are making strides. And with as weak as our division is, we need to be able to do it. And against Miami you had two teams hitting a crossroads at the same time. Both were heading somewhere: one trajectory up, one trajectory down... a loss could cost a coach their job, a win could extend their chances at seeing their vision through. We were kicked in the guts and should have died on the field, but managed to do the second biggest comeback in team history right then and there. To win. Any time you get a win like that, it's a good team-building win.

And it's about the team, isn't it. Look, I've criticized the heck out of Bryce and I'm still not sold on him, but a team doesn't have to win pretty for me to cheer their wins. They've just got to win and show some fight. Right now, they're doing that. 

We don't have a winning record yet, but we could break even this weekend. That means something. It really does. Win the next two and we would have a winning record for the first time since I don't know when. 

 

There is no easy way to "measure" it like you ask, it's not scientific of course, but it's almost easiest to judge it by your frustration levels throughout the game at what is going on.

In terms of player performance, it's things like how often you see Bryce throwing uncatchable passes, whether sailing them or because they are thrown into the ground.  For WRs, it's are they making catches, are they dropping it, just how they look out there, etc.

But for me, the big thing this thread was about, was specifically play calling and not to think we had a great called game just because we won and Rico had 200+ yards.

How many times did we line up on 1st and 10 and say to yourself, "welp, here comes another run for 2 yards" and then that's exactly what happened?

Or say a 3rd and 8 on our own 30 and you say, "here comes a screen pass that will only get 5 yards" and then that's exactly what happens?

Canales' play calling seems very predictable, stale, and with little imagination in play design (and many others have felt this same way since last year too).  To me, that is the big reason this game was a "bad win" because it's not like we did anything differently that made us appear to be a better team.  

It's why I say the 200+ yard game is because Rico made great plays, not because Canales called a great game that kept the defense on their heels and it allowed consistent 5-8 yard chunk runs throughout the game.

To that last point, I just saw that of his 206 yards, 169 of them were after contact.  Yet again, more proof that he didn't get his 200 yards because of a well called game by Canales, but by great individual efforts by him (it also pokes the hole in the argument someone made yesterday that said our OL was dominating theirs, as clearly it wasn't based on that stat).

If we come out this week and have unexpected play calling that keeps getting us chunk yards because the Cowboys don't know what is coming next, I'll be the first to congratulate Canales on a well planned and called game that showed marked improvement, regardless of whether or not we won or lost the game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Basbear said:

tuk21, be honest with me here

A

Tmac 12 recs 223 yards and Panthers lose

OR

B

Tmac 2 recs 8 yards 0 TDs and Panthers WIn

 

Which one are you picking?

You won't believe this, but neither with the information at hand

Nobody wants to believe me, but this thread and my issues with the team have absolutely nothing to do with T-Mac.  Do I wish he had more targets or some TD's already?  Of course, but he's 15th in the league in yards and on pace for 1,200 as a rookie, 2nd in the league in 20+ yard catches, 5th in the league in 1st down catches.  

He's on pace to shatter Panthers rookie records and could potentially end up in contention for a Pro Bowl slot depending how the season shakes out.

This thread was about our piss poor offensive play calling, as we're never going to be able to properly develop any of our young offensive weapons this year with how that's been going.

If we're having the same issues as always, then yea, I'm puling for option 1 for my guy, because what really matters isn't changing.

But if you tell me we had a great pass/run mix, keeping the defense off balance, getting chunk yards on a consistent basis, XL, Horn, Coker, Sanders, Evans, etc, make plays that show they're improving.

Then yes, I'll take option B with T-Mac taking a backseat when that other stuff happens, because it's what is best for the future of this franchise.  This season isn't just about T-Mac, it's about improving ALL of our young weapons, but that won't happen with the way Canales has been calling games (and with how Bryce has played).

And again, I'm not going to try and dig out months old posts, but I said this all offseason.  That actual standings wins and loses don't matter to me this year because I never believed we could be contenders.  Showing growth and improvement from the front office, to the coaches, to the players, was most important.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

You won't believe this, but neither with the information at hand

Nobody wants to believe me, but this thread and my issues with the team have absolutely nothing to do with T-Mac.  Do I wish he had more targets or some TD's already?  Of course, but he's 15th in the league in yards and on pace for 1,200 as a rookie, 2nd in the league in 20+ yard catches, 5th in the league in 1st down catches.  

He's on pace to shatter Panthers rookie records and could potentially end up in contention for a Pro Bowl slot depending how the season shakes out.

This thread was about our piss poor offensive play calling, as we're never going to be able to properly develop any of our young offensive weapons this year with how that's been going.

If we're having the same issues as always, then yea, I'm puling for option 1 for my guy, because what really matters isn't changing.

But if you tell me we had a great pass/run mix, keeping the defense off balance, getting chunk yards on a consistent basis, XL, Horn, Coker, Sanders, Evans, etc, make plays that show they're improving.

Then yes, I'll take option B with T-Mac taking a backseat when that other stuff happens, because it's what is best for the future of this franchise.  This season isn't just about T-Mac, it's about improving ALL of our young weapons, but that won't happen with the way Canales has been calling games (and with how Bryce has played).

And again, I'm not going to try and dig out months old posts, but I said this all offseason.  That actual standings wins and loses don't matter to me this year because I never believed we could be contenders.  Showing growth and improvement from the front office, to the coaches, to the players, was most important.

 

I fully understand the questioning of Dave and BY, just the timing of your concerns is my problem.

NFL is ultra hard to pull off the perfect game. In all my years Ive never seen a HC have the perfect game plan and have great play call after great play call. 

Tmac has helped in every game, honestly more than I thought he was going to show. It does look like he was in fact the reason to trade AT and allow Tamc to feast on his targets. I have re-watched the wins, I have seen Tmac get red zone looks. Brother, he's about the 80-90% of passing attack. Dave is young inexperienced HC and he's learning on the job, hope he improves along with BYs confidence. 

 

Its going to be alllllll right, trust me as your co-pilot. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • all offense.  OT. TE. G. in rd 1 to 3    Rd 1 19. Carolina Panthers: Blake Miller, OT, Clemson   OFFENSIVE TACKLE  6Grade: 1st–2nd rd. Blake Miller Clemson Has the physical traits, football IQ and toughness that NFL teams will bet on every time. A former high-level wrestler, four-year starter and team captain, Miller plays with great consistency and has the football IQ to make up for his penchant for playing tall. He may never dominate, but he could start for a decade.   Overview Hometown: Strongsville, OH Birthday: February 25, 2004 Age: 22.2 Jersey: No. 78 High School: Strongsville Year: Fourth-year senior A four-year starter at Clemson, Miller was a mainstay at right tackle in former offensive coordinator Garrett Riley’s balanced gap/zone scheme. Highly recruited out of the Cleveland area, he earned a starting job from day one at Clemson and was a model of consistency for a mostly inconsistent college offense. He started all 54 games the past four seasons (most consecutive starts by a non-specialist in school history) and set the Clemson record for career offensive snaps played (3,778). Miller has a good mix of on-field talent and intangibles. In pass protection, he is quick off the ball, with the range to mirror rushers up the arc and a surprisingly sturdy anchor to answer different types of rushers. Miller also shows his foot quickness and physical demeanor to move bodies in the run game. He isn’t a great bender, though, and savvy NFL rushers will find some success using his aggressive techniques against him. His coaches rave about his smarts and football character (NFL scout: “I think he missed one practice in four years. The thought of letting down his coaches and teammates kills him.”). Dane’s takeawa Miller has an upright play style that could lead to issues vs. NFL competition, but he has the type of profile (physical traits, football IQ, competitive toughness) that teams will bet on every time. He should compete for a starting right tackle role as a rookie Combine stats Hover any column header to see its definition. STAT HT   WT   HAND   ARM   WING   BP   10   20   40   VJ   BJ   SS   3C   Combine 6′63/4 317 93/4 341/4 837/8 32 1.75 2.92 5.04 32 9′5 DNP DNP Pro Day 6′65/8 318 93/4 343/8 823/4 DNP DNP DNP DNP DNP DNP 4.65 7.75 Note: Combine: Limited workout (choice). Strengths Prototypical size — broad shoulders, outstanding arm length and athletic build Urgent in his setup and the way he operates (Duke edge rusher Wesley Williams said Miller was the best blocker he faced in 2025) Sets with a wide, sturdy base to withstand bull rushers down his middle Quick to respond and find balance after first contact in pass pro Has play strength to press rushers off him and keep them at bay Thudding, decisive hands as a run blocker; able to generate movement on drive blocks Shows off athleticism as a puller and on the move Voted a senior captain; member of the leadership council (NFL scout: “Love his focused mindset. Doesn’t cheat himself or his teammates.”) Remarkable toughness and consistently plays through bumps and bruises (broken wrist during 2025 spring practices required surgery, but he missed only one practice) Weaknesses Upright posture and inconsistent technique in pass protection Delivers adequate pop but doesn’t have overwhelming power to create knockback Can be late to draw hands from holster, opening his chest to rushers Gets caught leaning; requires a half-beat to get back in position NFL rushers will find some success setting him up Would like to see better control on perimeter to make it harder on defenders to avoid him Almost all (96.5 percent) of college snaps came at right tackle — lingering questions about his position flex   Rd 2  51. Carolina Panthers: Eli Stowers, TE, Vanderbilt   Eli Stowers Vanderbilt A mismatch-creating, explosive pass-catcher who must show he can block at the NFL level.     Overview Hometown: Denton, TX Birthday: April 15, 2003 Age: 23 Jersey: No. 9 High School: Guyer Year: Fifth-year senior A two-year starter at Vanderbilt (three-year starter overall), Stowers was a detached tight end (70.7 percent of snaps in the slot) in offensive coordinator Tim Beck’s run-heavy scheme. A highly recruited quarterback out of high school, Stowers began at Texas A&M and then New Mexico State but suffered multiple shoulder injuries, which forced him to change positions (Stowers: “I could never throw the same.”). With Diego Pavia as his quarterback for that transition, Stowers’ receiving production improved each of the past three seasons, including 769 receiving yards in 2025, tops among FBS tight ends and earning him All-America honors and the Mackey Award. An above-average athlete for the position, Stowers attacks defenders’ techniques and uses his quickness to consistently win one-on-one on slants, digs or seam balls. Because of the quarterback and scheme at Vanderbilt, he was asked to use his burst for quick windows and is unproven in other areas, although he has the speed to be more of a deep threat in a pro-style scheme. He delivered mixed results when asked to attack in traffic, but he has reliable hands and fluid adjustment skills. As a blocker, he has questionable physicality and sustain strength but competes when sealing or walling off defenders. Dane’s takeaway Stowers will need to prove himself as a serviceable blocker at the NFL level, but he is explosive as a pass catcher, and I love the way he maximizes his catch radius. He has mismatch-creating potential and can eventually develop into an NFL starter. Combine stats Hover any column header to see its definition. Scroll right to see more metrics. STATHTWTHANDARMWINGBP102040VJBJSS3C Combine6′33/423993/4325/8793/4DNP1.592.624.51451/211′3DNPDNP Pro Day6′31/224291/2327/879DNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNP Note: Combine: Limited workout (choice). Strengths Broad-shouldered frame, with adequate bulk and room to add mass “Freaks List” athlete, which is reflected on the tape and in testing Graceful speed to attack down the seam or after the catch Fluid route runner who can sink and cut on command Quarterback background is an asset when reading coverages and finding windows Solid ball skills, especially for a former quarterback (3.9 percent career drop rate) Frequently widens catch radius to make proper adjustments and bail out his quarterback NFL scouts say he logs “countless hours” at the facility and wants to be coached “harder than the rest of the team” Team captain; driven attitude made him a leader at Vandy Led FBS tight ends in 2025 in receiving yards per game (64.1) Weaknesses Lean muscle structure — more linear body type than what some teams prefer Competes but has marginal play strength as a run blocker (21 percent of snaps came inline) Light in the pants and likely will never overwhelm defenders at point of attack Not consistently efficient blocking backside on the move Can do a better job selling route movements with his eyes/shoulders Want to see him be more aggressive finishing on the ball in traffic Durable after moving to tight end at Vandy but had two key injuries before that: injured right (throwing) shoulder in high school, then tore labrum during freshman year, which required postseason surgery (Jan. 2022); torn PCL and meniscus in left knee in 2019 state championship game, which required surgery (Jan. 2020).         rd 3 83. Carolina Panthers: Jalen Farmer, G, Kentucky   Jalen Farmer Kentucky An athletic boulder who projects as a starter in the right scheme.   Overview Hometown: Covington, GA Birthday: January 6, 2004 Age: 22.3 Jersey: No. 52 High School: Eastside Year: Fourth-year junior A two-year starter at Kentucky, Farmer lined up at right guard in former offensive coordinator Bush Hamdan’s balanced scheme with gap-run principles. He struggled to see the field in two seasons in Gainesville, but he got in better shape after transferring to Lexington and things started to click. He started all 24 games at right guard the past two seasons and impressed during Senior Bowl week. Farmer has outstanding size, play strength and presence. Using his long arms and leg drive, he can fit up and dump defenders in the run game. He has a stout anchor and heavy punch in pass protection and is quick to replace his hands and recover when he’s initially beaten. His pad-level issues pop up more than you’d like, and the nasty flashes need to become more consistent. Dane’s takeaway Farmer is an athletic boulder in pass protection and a bulldozer as a run blocker. He should continue to ascend with pro coaching. He has NFL starting-caliber ability, especially if he lands with a team that specializes in a downhill, smash-mouth run game. ADVERTISEMENT Combine stats Hover any column header to see its definition. STATHTWTHANDARMWINGBP102040VJBJSS3C Combine6′47/831291/4341/4825/8DNP1.752.884.93279′0DNPDNP Pro DayDNP320DNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNPDNP Note: Combine: Limited workout (choice). Strengths Boasts an NFL body — broad chest, thick core and long arms Strong at the point and flashes a finishing demeanor Drives his legs in the run game to generate jarring power at contact Functional mobility to wall off defenders and execute pulls Stout as a pass blocker to gobble up bull rushers Can be caught leaning out front but recovery skills are impressive Forceful hands to put dents into defenders when he connects Flagged just once in 2025 (holding vs. Eastern Michigan) Served as a team captain in four games in 2025 (NFL scout: “Matured and took better care of his body after transferring.”) Started all 24 games the past two seasons Weaknesses Pops upright too often at the snap, with inconsistent sink Can be caught oversetting and crossed up by quickness Late with his hands — would like to see him tighten his carriage Tardy working through slow-developing pressures and games Can do better job refitting in the run game when he doesn’t initially establish leverage Inconsistencies redirecting and adjusting in space will be more noticeable vs. NFL athletes Position flexibility questions — 100 percent of college snaps came at right guard ADVERTISEMENT College stats Hover any column header to see its definition. YEARSCHOOLGPGSPOS 2022Florida20— 2023Florida20— 2024Kentucky1212RG 2025Kentucky1212RG 2022 Enrolled May 2022 2024 Enrolled January 2024 Background Jalen Farmer, who has a brother (Tristan), was born and raised in the Atlanta area by his mother (Kartella Fuller) and father (Shaun Farmer). While growing up in a football family, he was “always around” the game and had several cousins who played. Farmer started playing at age 7 and was a defensive lineman and linebacker before moving exclusively to the offensive line. Farmer enrolled at Eastside High School in Covington, Ga., which is the alma mater of NFL players Sheldon Rankins and Eric Stokes. He was a four-year letterman on varsity and started 11 games as a sophomore left guard in 2019. Farmer returned as the starting left guard as a junior in 2020 and helped Eastside to 10 wins. As a senior, he played left guard and defensive tackle and was named 2021 Class 5A Region 8 Lineman of the Year. Farmer posted 50 tackles, five tackles for loss, two sacks and one forced fumble as a senior, while adding a 1-yard rushing touchdown. He also lettered in track at Eastside, setting personal bests of 33 feet, 5 inches in the shot put and 61-4 in the discus.  A three-star recruit, Farmer was the 31st-ranked interior offensive lineman in the 2022 class and the No. 73 recruit in Georgia. After he became a starter as a sophomore, he picked up his first scholarship offer the following spring, from Georgia Tech (May 2020). Before his senior season, Farmer added an offer from Florida and committed to former head coach Dan Mullen, who then was fired a few months later. In the weeks before signing day, Farmer received a late flurry of offers from Alabama, Auburn, Kentucky and Mississippi State. But thanks to a strong push from new Gators head coach Billy Napier, Farmer stayed committed to his first choice. He was the 13th-ranked recruit in Napier’s first class in Gainesville. After two seasons buried on the depth chart, Farmer entered the transfer portal in December 2023 and committed to Kentucky.  He elected to skip his senior year and declare for the NFL Draft. Farmer accepted a late invite to the Senior Bowl. ADVERTISEMENT    
    • Unfortunately you just can't get through to some of these folks. The most successful season in Panthers history our #1 WR was Ted Ginn Jr who had just as many bone headed drops as he did highlight touchdowns. We already have the highest paid OL in the league two years running. We need a balanced roster more than anything else clearly.
    • https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2026/04/06/nfl-draft-trade-rumors-panthers-chargers-quentin-johnston/89484524007/?link_source=ta_first_comment&taid=69d47a425bd91b00016ecfb1&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=facebook Saw this hypothetical trade down scenario on Panthers wire where they had us dropping from 19 to 22 trade with the chargers which also knitted us the addition of Quinton Johnston personally I would take this deal because the players available at 22 and 19 are largely the same you could pick up maybe a tackle or even one of those defensive tackles that we liked like banks.  Grabbing a wide receiver who could probably replace legate and be a deep ball threat would be just what the doctor ordered in my opinion Yes he's kind of a reclamation project similar to legette but I think he's shown he can play and has more big game moments than legette. I think it would be like getting two for the price of one really allowing us to feel more holes getting a wide receiver and another spot filled for nothing but two or three draft spots.
×
×
  • Create New...