Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF Grades vs Dolphins


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, cranky said:

I think it's because of this (not mine, tukafan 21 posted it earlier)

"So I just went and looked at the play by play and he had 162 of his 206 yards on just 6 of his 23 carries, which means he had 44 yard on his other 17 carries, or just 2.6 yards per carry."

 

That is common in rb stats. You pound and pound and then they break. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Good lord people get excited every time Wallace gets to chase down the four defensive players in the nfl slower than him. 

Yeah. I am holding out hope he can be serviceable by year three. That is my ceiling for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

He can be serviceable on special teams which is fine. You need good players on special teams and you can hide their deficiencies. 

you can’t unteach slow. 

Oh, you may not recall but I isolated him in rewatching a few games last year. I was really disappointed in what I saw. 

At the same time, a lot of that slowness could be uncertainty and hesitancy because he is still over his head out there. 3 years. 
 

I would happily take an upgrade and make him depth, no doubt. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Good lord people get excited every time Wallace gets to chase down the four offensive players in the nfl slower than him. 

Being slow is the least of his problems. He has all the physical tools his problem has been play recognition and processing. If he gets that I think he can be a pretty solid player for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, strato said:

I think he did. It has the potential to be a historically productive draft relative to our franchise. 
 

And you have the dubious top 2 selections in 2024, but also Mike Jackson, CSW, Sanders, maybe even Wallace.  

He didn't have his system in place that first draft because of Scott getting fired after the season so I give him a pass for 2024 even tho jury is still out on XL and it's a longshot but Brooks looked pretty good in his 10 snaps last year, it's possible with modern medicine he is still a good player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with PFF almost entirely. I thought Mike Jack struggled yesterday. I think that injury hampered him. 

Offense in general was very solid. If bryce doesn't have that ridiculous fumble, he's probably a top 4 player for us. Legette was much better. Primary linebackers had good days. I think were a poor matchup defensively with the dolphins, so the way yesterday transpired really surprised me. Kudos to the players and coaches to adjust after a first quarter in which I thought Darren Waller may break records. 

If we can find a pass rush and some linebackers, I love the young group we have on both sides of the ball. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, strato said:

 

At the same time, a lot of that slowness could be uncertainty and hesitancy because he is still over his head out there. 3 years. 

that's totally possible, and i'm not saying he's as bad as unathletic as rosebloom or anything, but ive just never seen him do anything impressive. I've seen him trying to race a RB to the boundary multiple times, plays that don't require any recognition; that is your guy, cover him. 

I'm pretty sure I could turn the corner on him and I a MACI procedure done 5 months ago. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
    • Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
×
×
  • Create New...