Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I’m gonna say it… I’m proud of Bryce.


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

He doesn't have the talent to be the long-term answer as a starter but I've always legitimately liked the person and I respect the guy. He's tough and he doesn't quit on himself. He took his benching like a man and improved himself. I respect that. I just don't want to see us making the mistake of committing to him contractually as a franchise QB. That will be crippling to the organization.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

But bryce didn't even need to throw at all for us to move the chains lol. Dallas run game was nowhere to be found. Yes Dak didn't have much pressure but he had to make some tight windows throws to put points on the board. 

 

Well he definitely needed to throw for them to score. Which is what he did. That and 3rd/4th and short plays when the run game couldn't get it done. They tried running a few times in those situations and failed. 3 TDs in the game for Carolina. 3 of them were passing TDs. Canales didn't want that to be the case. It was out of necessity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Im legitimately more proud of the huddle. A thread like this normally gets toxic quick. Wasn’t even much name calling. Yall are growing much more than bryce.

Talent evaluation issues aren't the fault of the player. All you can ask of the player is to work hard and do everything the coaches ask of him. By all indications he has done that. Same for guys like Clausen and Armanti Edwards. It's not their fault that the organization over drafted them. They put in the work they just weren't good enough.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Talent evaluation issues aren't the fault of the player. All you can ask of the player is to work hard and do everything the coaches ask of him. By all indications he has done that. Same for guys like Clausen and Armanti Edwards. It's not their fault that the organization over drafted them. They put in the work they just weren't good enough.

Well sure, im not sure why my comment got quoted for this but i agree with you. I don’t blame bryce for anything. He’s an easy guy to like that puts the work in and has my respect. His parents did really well raising him and he’s done a great job continuing on the path they helped him walk. 
 

my comments on bryce are always going to be on football. No reason to critique/criticize bryce the person.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...