Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 6 PFF grades vs. DAL


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

Rico did have some misses in pass blocking and that may be where Chuba sneaks back in.  82 feels low for his rushing still hahahaah 

As I pointed out in another thread, run grades are not simply based upon statistical production---even the running part. They look at expectations based upon how well the line and other skill players blocked for you as well on each play. The O-line has been blocking extremely well making things a lot easier for RBs.

And that's a great grade by the way.

Edited by TD alt
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TD alt said:

As I pointed out in another thread, run grades are not simply based upon statistical production---even the running part. They look at expectations based upon how well the line and other skill players blocked for you as well on each play. The O-line has been blocking extremely well making things a lot easier for RBs.

And that's a great grade by the way.

I know it's a great grade, and I get how PFF does their grading, that's why I had said "still" in there, as in "despite that being a great grade it still feels low given his production and how he did it". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

The pass rush was disappointing. The pass rush grades reflect that. 

It was inconsistent. It would be nice to get players up in the mid 70s.

37 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Also lol what if we have always had 2 elite LBs on this roster and just had them playing the wrong spot 

Putting players in a position to succeed isn't just football rhetoric, it's a thing that great coaches do with consistency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

He was awful pass blocking. Only thing he did wrong but it was bad. I think he gave up at least one sack and multiple pressures. It wasn’t even mediocre, it was barely touching blitzers, almost like he was trying to slide by them and not actually make contact.

Yea, his pass pro has been rough. Makes me wonder if that's why we're seeing Deejay Dallas as much as we are.

Fortunately, Rico's also been running angry as Hell and has more than made up for it with his production on the ground!

Edited by Icege
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it was another amazing  career day for Rico, but what makes me even more optimistic for the Panthers going forward was the unbelievably improved play from our middle linebackers, Wallace and Rozeboom!! These guys had been our most glaring liability prior to playing the Cowgirls, let's hope they can continue to play well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Navy_football said:

I thought Legette would be higher too. He's normally pretty good blocking for the run. 

Some of these grades are inevitably inexplicable. In his case I am guessing the lateral may have pissed someone off. 

I think they really need to revamp their criteria for running backs. That is lower than last week for the game’s MVP. 
 

It seems as if the OL doing their jobs (which they did very well) takes away from a RB killing it. That is not right IMO. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Putting players in a position to succeed isn't just football rhetoric, it's a thing that great coaches do with consistency.

I agree, but I also think coaches take a little while to determine what position is best for a specific player.  Regarding Wallace, he started this year with 11 games under his belt, so it might have taken the staff a little while to determine where he is best.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

I really don’t understand the turnaround of Wallace and Rozeboom after they swapped roles. 
 

Like can Rozeboom just not think and just hits stuff or is Wallace just damn good at calling defenses.

Both can be true.

Everybody isn't made for the mic.

I don't know who was responsible, but somebody has an eye.

Edited by TD alt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I agree, but I also think coaches take a little while to determine what position is best for a specific player.  Regarding Wallace, he started this year with 11 games under his belt, so it might have taken the staff a little while to determine where he is best.  

In his case, based off of last year, more like how they could best work around him.
But he is finally getting it in forward gear a little. Glad to see it. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Both can be true.

Everybody isn't made for the mic.

I don't know who was responsible, but somebody has an eye.

IIRC one of the reasons the took him was they thought he had a brain in his head. And he was a captain in school which indicates some leadership qualities, ie a certain amount of intelligence. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • awesome interview. Love the guy. 
    • all the trades and using PFFs draft rankings and Gemini's analysis: This is a high-value mock draft that effectively uses trade-down strategies to rebuild the Carolina Panthers' defensive interior and add depth to a roster with multiple holes. By turning mid-round capital into a volume of picks, you've secured several "sliding" stars and developmental high-ceiling players. Based on 2026 PFF big board trends and player value, here is the analysis: Draft Grade: A- The Top Picks: Interior Dominance  * 19. Peter Woods (DT, Clemson): Getting Woods at 19 is a steal. Heading into the 2025 season, he was viewed as a potential top-5 talent. While his production dipped slightly, his 4.75 40-yard dash at 315 lbs is elite. He provides the Panthers with a versatile disruptor who can play 3-tech or slide outside.  * 63. Dontay Corleone (DT, Cincinnati): "The Godfather" is one of the best pure nose tackles in the class. Pairing him with Woods creates an immediate identity for the Panthers' front seven. PFF loves his "unmovable" anchor. Securing him at the end of Round 2 after trading down from 51/53 is excellent value. The Mid-Round Steals  * 83. Deontae Lawson (LB, Alabama): Lawson is a high-IQ "green dot" linebacker. Many scouts projected him as a late 1st or early 2nd rounder before an ACL injury in late 2024. Getting a 2-time Alabama captain at 83 to lead the defense is a massive win for culture and stability.  * 130. Drew Allar (QB, Penn State): This is the "high-upside lottery ticket" pick. Allar has prototypical size (6'5", 240 lbs) and a massive arm. His stock fell due to a 2025 ankle injury and inconsistency, but at 130, he’s a low-risk, high-reward backup/successor to Bryce Young if the former No. 1 pick continues to struggle. Trade Analysis & Late Round Value Your strategy of "tier-dropping" (trading 51 for 53/121 and 53 for 63/95) allowed you to stay in the same talent bracket while picking up Kevin Coleman Jr. (WR) and Genesis Smith (S).  * 168. Parker Brailsford (OC, Alabama): Great value for a technical center who can compete for a depth spot.  * 169. Tacario Davis (CB, Washington): At 6'4", he is a rare physical specimen at corner. PFF and other boards often have him as a Day 2 talent; getting him in the 5th round (via the 161 trade) is arguably your best value pick of the draft. Summary of Picks | Pick | Player | Position | School | Analysis | | 19 | Peter Woods | DT | Clemson | Elite traits; Top-10 ceiling. | | 63 | Dontay Corleone | DT | Cincinnati | Best run stuffer in the class. | | 83 | Deontae Lawson | LB | Alabama | Vocal leader; sliding due to injury. | | 121 | Kevin Coleman Jr. | WR | Missouri | Speed threat to complement the room. | | 130 | Drew Allar | QB | Penn State | High-ceiling developmental passer. | | 169 | Tacario Davis | CB | Washington | Massive reach/length for a late flyer. | Final Verdict You addressed the trenches aggressively and took advantage of "injury discounts" on Lawson and Allar. The only minor critique is that the roster still feels thin at Edge (until the 211 pick), but the sheer volume of talent added to the interior DL and Secondary compensates for it.
    • But but the concerts    Soccer is not the reason we have turf, soccer players want real grass even more than football players. 
×
×
  • Create New...