Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Podcast will the Panthers give Young 2027 option plus DC approach with Yoing


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

To my knowledge that's only been done once.  Daniel Jones.  Generally a decision is made one way or the other.  And if tepper is calling the shots the decision has been made lol

Oh, I know, that's why I added "IMHO."

Tepp gon' Tepp... smdh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm pretty sure Young's contract is almost fully guaranteed. If that's the case I would guess he will be on the roster for his 4th season. Whether he's the starter or not will be up for debate. 

If the panthers decide to make him play out the fourth year of his contract than he’d probably demand a trade or cut and refuse to play.  

his 2024 salary would be 1.1 mil without anything after that. 

He could get more than that on a two year backup deal. For example, Mac jones’ contract to be a backup is 2 years 8 million. He was much more productive as a stater than Bryce has ever been, but just to give a comparison point.  

Edited by electro's horse
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

If the panthers decide to make him play out the fourth year of his contract than he’d probably demand a trade or cut and refuse to play.  

his 2024 salary would be 1.1 mil without anything after that. 

He could get more than that on a two year backup deal. For example, Mac jones’ contract to be a backup is 2 years 8 million. He was much more productive as a stater than Bryce has ever been, but just to give a comparison point.  

His 2026 salary would also include a $4.8 mil roster bonus. That is guaranteed money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is a big HELL NO. As bad as XL was this season, at least he adds a dimension that the coaches can use for specific plays. Coleman is just as bad, yet adds zero diversity to our receiving corps. I’ll take the guy that at least cares enough to show up to meetings. Getting traded to a new team won’t change either of their work ethics.
    • I don't think there is any real reason to amend the rule. If you do, the teams will just find a way to abuse it. All the Browns have to do is just interview SOMEONE to "get through" the process. Hell, interview Jim Caldwell if that's what the actual goal is, just to get around it.  Also, they have all of the candidates required for the Rooney Rule in Aden Durde and Nate Scheelhaase. They are in full compliance already. Scheelhaase is already scheduled for a second interview, for that matter.
    • I don't know about the stans but he's at times been like 60 percent of the offense on a playoff calibre team. He put up 1202 rushing yards and 10 touchdowns, then had effing 102 receptions for 924 yards and seven receiving touchdowns. He touched the ball 413 times this season (an average of 24 times per game.) Then you have to add in that he's a hell of a blocker when called upon. Without him, the injury depleted 49ers in a hot NFCWest division don't make the playoffs at all.  If that isn't the Most Valuable Player on the team then who should be? The idea that it is an award solely for QBs is just narrow. Edit to add: Will he win it? No. 
×
×
  • Create New...