Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

what does bryce young excel at


Recommended Posts

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

my bad I forget to say "one of the worst"

 

now he is mid 20s congrats baby steps (no pun intended)   

Your still smearing the numbers to make a point. He's not "one of the worst". He's playing just as well as Caleb Williams and Trevor Lawrence. There are 11 worse than him - bye your own standards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cranky said:

Your still smearing the numbers to make a point. He's not "one of the worst". He's playing just as well as Caleb Williams and Trevor Lawrence. There are 11 worse than him - bye your own standards. 

I wasnt smearing numbers I posted straight from that website.  And who gives two fugs if he is better then TL or williams?   You just cherry picking rando qbs to pump him up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

I wasnt smearing numbers I posted straight from that website.  And who gives two fugs if he is better then TL or williams?   You just cherry picking rando qbs to pump him up?

They aren't random: They are the QB's just above him in the rankings. You know, the metrics you brought up to prove how bad he is.

If I was cherry picking, I would have included these QBs as well. I mean their completion % isn't exactly above average either.

 

Screenshot 2025-10-24 at 2.24.18 PM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cranky said:

mrcompletey11 said he was the worst using stats from the NFL site. I'm simply showing he is wrong.

again I should have said some of the worst but the stats I provided were where he ranked.  Not overall ranking of every qb.  He is statistically one of the worst qbs in the nfl

 

and then there is also the eyeball test

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

So would you seriously be happy with exercising his fifth year option and committing to him for the next two years?

There are some visionaries here and in another three years they will be proven right. We are just too impatient 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, cranky said:

I disagree:

Red lines are the trending line. Red columns are the first game of each season.

Screenshot 2025-10-17 at 8.41.20 PM.png

Question.. the first group, is that supposed to be sequential representations of his game by game rating? 
 

Just looking at it from that angle, the tallest bar would be the Green Bay game I am guessing. 
The next two games we were shut out. He was pretty bad but those ratings aren’t both bad. (I mean they aren’t great but he was shut out, that should be about a zero) And some of the next group were when he didn’t play until garbage time and he got some nice ratings but seem to be counted as whole games. That is a bit misleading to my mind  

I hate stats sometimes man. Watching them play is so much more informative than the grades people give them. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cranky said:

I disagree:

Red lines are the trending line. Red columns are the first game of each season.

Screenshot 2025-10-17 at 8.41.20 PM.png

you tell me what the QB who played vs the Jags, Cards, Falcons, Patriots, Jets should be described as.  The word is below average.  Which is the majority of his games.   Which was my post. 

What is the QB rating?  He presently ranks with the 30th highest this season on ESPN with their qualified QBs.  And this is the "good" Bryce lol.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

you tell me what the QB who played vs the Jags, Cards, Falcons, Patriots, Jets should be described as.  The word is below average.  Which is the majority of his games.   Which was my post. 

What is the QB rating?  He presently ranks with the 30th highest this season on ESPN with their qualified QBs.  And this is the "good" Bryce lol.  

One of these days maybe we will be free of this weight. Either he does something real and meaningful or he will be gone.

Until then it is the inflating his good plays and ignoring the rest and we will plod along hoping for a 200 yard rushing day. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...