Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB options for the 2026 season


CBird
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, PanthersNCSU said:

Bryce's option is 100% being picked up. I'd be floored if it wasn't. He's going to make more sense than 95% of the free agents, but it's just the option. Doesn't prevent us from going after somebody, drafting somebody, etc. 

Best case you draft a guy who shows promise, Bryce is on his option and plays well, and then we're in a Vikings style scenario with Darnold/McCarthy. Hopefully the early returns for us end up being better than the Vikings. 

The issue with that option is that it's going to be pretty pricey. $26.5ish mil is a tough pill to swallow for a non-starter.

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Gotta sign a decent FA and add another one in the draft. Don't force anything but if the right guy is there in the 1st don't hesitate. Bryce ain't it.

Doesn't have to be in the 1st either. I think this class will be pretty deep with #2 QB's.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

picking up the option commits us to bryce for 2 more years at roughly 12 and 37ish million per.   So so much for the rookie contract being in our favor

https://overthecap.com/player/bryce-young/10825

You are misreading that table. The $12 mil is happening no matter what. That is fully guaranteed. $37 mil is the value of his total rookie contract without the option. The option would be $26.5 mil at the moment, but that number would likely rise.

Currently:

https://overthecap.com/fifth-year-option-projections

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bryce is a starting QB, even if he's the 30th best one.  Short of getting Daniel Jones in here, or trading for a QB, he's our starter until we draft another one. 

Not saying it's the right decision and I'm not a fan, but a one year commitment with the option...they're not going to blink at that IMO. If they start talking extension with him, we riot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PanthersNCSU said:

Bryce is a starting QB, even if he's the 30th best one.  Short of getting Daniel Jones in here, or trading for a QB, he's our starter until we draft another one. 

Not saying it's the right decision and I'm not a fan, but a one year commitment with the option...they're not going to blink at that IMO. If they start talking extension with him, we riot. 

I mean, I don't really think he is a starting QB. We are starting him at QB. Anthony Richardson was technically a starting QB. Justin Fields is technically a starting QB. The one common trait they share is that none of them are actually starting QB caliber.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, PanthersNCSU said:

Bryce's option is 100% being picked up. I'd be floored if it wasn't. He's going to make more sense than 95% of the free agents, but it's just the option. Doesn't prevent us from going after somebody, drafting somebody, etc. 

Best case you draft a guy who shows promise, Bryce is on his option and plays well, and then we're in a Vikings style scenario with Darnold/McCarthy. Hopefully the early returns for us end up being better than the Vikings. 

This right here. Might as well pick it up, even if Bryce isn't the long term QB. We aren't paying Daniel Jones the crazy contract he will earn after this year and the rest of the QBs just aren't very good.

Sadly, this draft class of QBs has looked really bad in college this year and I am struggling to find one worth drafting high. Maybe Nussmeier because he has all the arm strength/accuracy qualities you want in an NFL QB (worried about how awful he is at staring down his 1st read and not being able to read coverages, but that can theoretically be fixed).

Haven't looked into the 2027 QB draft class, but maybe signing Mariota to be backup for a year (or 2) behind Bryce wouldn't be the worst. I have watched a bit of Mariota this year and don't think he looked that bad against the Cowboys & Chiefs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The issue with that option is that it's going to be pretty pricey. $26.5ish mil is a tough pill to swallow for a non-starter.

Doesn't have to be in the 1st either. I think this class will be pretty deep with #2 QB's.

Yeah, I don't want to force anything. Forget going into the draft with the plan to definitely draft a QB in the first. You don't do yourself any favors reaching on need. If the right fit isn't there I'm perfectly fine with adding a developmental guy after the first. We need multiple QBs. We need a starter and we need a backup. There's just not gonna be any energy in this fanbase as long as we keep trotting Bryce out there pretending that he's a starting QB. There will start to be hope again as soon as it's clear that we're turning the page on the whole Bryce thing.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

I say bring Lance in. We have an OL, decent weapons and, by god, a QB whisperer as a HC. (obviously joking about that last part) Plus, we're statistically due to have a reclamation project work.

We had that, sort of. Jake Delhomme. 

We had a shot at a real franchise QB that wasn't even a reclaimation project. We ended up making him play DE on the scout team.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

This right here. Might as well pick it up, even if Bryce isn't the long term QB. We aren't paying Daniel Jones the crazy contract he will earn after this year and the rest of the QBs just aren't very good.

Sadly, this draft class of QBs has looked really bad in college this year and I am struggling to find one worth drafting high. Maybe Nussmeier because he has all the arm strength/accuracy qualities you want in an NFL QB (worried about how awful he is at staring down his 1st read and not being able to read coverages, but that can theoretically be fixed).

Haven't looked into the 2027 QB draft class, but maybe signing Mariota to be backup for a year (or 2) behind Bryce wouldn't be the worst. I have watched a bit of Mariota this year and don't think he looked that bad against the Cowboys & Chiefs.

If you have been in college as long as Nussmeier and you are a one read QB, you are not an NFL QB. That's a 6th/7th rounder even with the size/arm.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, I don't want to force anything. Forget going into the draft with the plan to definitely draft a QB in the first. You don't do yourself any favors reaching on need. If the right fit isn't there I'm perfectly fine with adding a developmental guy after the first. We need multiple QBs. We need a starter and we need a backup. There's just not gonna be any energy in this fanbase as long as we keep trotting Bryce out there pretending that he's a starting QB. There will start to be hope again as soon as it's clear that we're turning the page on the whole Bryce thing.

Yeah, I am fine with rostering 3 QB's. A older vet/gamble on a younger, "distressed asset" vet and a drafted QB. 

At least there are some options to roll through when Bryce is just Bryce again.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, I am fine with rostering 3 QB's. A older vet/gamble on a younger, "distressed asset" vet and a drafted QB. 

At least there are some options to roll through when Bryce is just Bryce again.

This. When Bryce falters again we have to have legit options behind him, not just the washed up ghost of Andy Dalton.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

If you have been in college as long as Nussmeier and you are a one read QB, you are not an NFL QB. That's a 6th/7th rounder even with the size/arm.

Fair enough. He did have to sit behind Daniels for a while and I think the playcalling has been just awful for LSU this year and hasn't helped him.

But having a high level arm will get you drafted in the 1st or 2nd round, no matter what your processing level is. NFL teams will always think they can fix those types of QBs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Mac Jones is under contract.

These are the QB's that will be free agents(not including any potential cuts).

Screenshot_20251030_070819.thumb.jpg.9aa2144b925a92695b208c0bbfc0b572.jpgScreenshot_20251030_070839.thumb.jpg.0c8cea3d78e3d4b96e6b8dce0a0d8623.jpg

Of those guys, I would say Sam Howell in a heartbeat.   There is no chance Daniel Jones leaves the colts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PanthersNCSU said:

Bryce's option is 100% being picked up. I'd be floored if it wasn't. He's going to make more sense than 95% of the free agents, but it's just the option. Doesn't prevent us from going after somebody, drafting somebody, etc. 

Best case you draft a guy who shows promise, Bryce is on his option and plays well, and then we're in a Vikings style scenario with Darnold/McCarthy. Hopefully the early returns for us end up being better than the Vikings. 

Name a QB as bad as Bryce who had their 5th picked up? 

You certainly can name better ones who didn't have it picked up. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Don't buy that game being rigged either. They didn't need to. We played (and coached) like dog sh-t 😖
    • Partially. Part of it is Canales. I think if there was a McCaffrey, Smith, Olsen, Williams, etc it would change the offense. Bryce is a game manager, not game changer that’s established, but who can make a big play? Nobody. I have yet to see a wideout except maybe once break a tackle and take it to the house. Outside of Miami, I can’t think of a long run that flipped the field.
    • The "Fix" is in the Personnel: Referee Tendencies as Management Tools If the NFL is "managed," the primary lever for that management is crew assignment. A "rigged" game doesn't require a backroom bribe; it simply requires assigning a referee crew whose known statistical biases align with the league's desired outcome. By analyzing data from the 2023-2025 seasons, we can categorize specific officials into "profiles" that sophisticated bettors—and likely the league itself—use to predict game flow. I. The "Over" Architects (For High-Scoring Spectacles) When the league needs a primetime game (like Monday Night Football) to be an exciting shootout, they can assign crews that historically "swallow the whistle," allowing offenses to operate without rhythm-killing flags. • Bill Vinovich: The "Let Them Play" King. • The Stat: In the 2024 season, Vinovich's crew averaged the lowest number of flags per game (12.76) and the fewest offensive holding calls (1.59 per game). • The "Management" Angle: Fewer holding calls mean quarterbacks have more time to throw and drives aren't stalled by 10-yard penalties. Assigning Vinovich to a game involving a superstar QB (like Patrick Mahomes or Joe Burrow) virtually guarantees a cleaner, higher-scoring game. It is no coincidence Vinovich is frequently assigned to Super Bowls, where the league wants a fluid, exciting product rather than a penalty-fest. • Alex Moore & Scott Novak: The "Over" Darlings. • The Stat: In recent data, Alex Moore’s crew hit the "Over" (total points) in nearly 77% of their games. Scott Novak followed closely at nearly 70%. • The Betting Edge: These crews tend to call defensive pass interference (DPI) more strictly than offensive holding, which directly gifts yardage to offenses and extends drives. II. The "Under" Enforcers (For Keeping Games Close) Conversely, if the league needs to slow down a runaway offense or keep a game close to the spread, they can assign "flag-happy" crews that disrupt game flow. • Shawn Hochuli: The Drive Killer. • The Stat: Hochuli’s crew is consistently among the league leaders in total penalties and specifically offensive holding. In 2024, his crew averaged over 3.2 holding calls per game. • The "Management" Angle: Offensive holding is the most effective tool to kill a drive. A 1st-and-20 is statistically much harder to convert than a 1st-and-10. If a team like the Chiefs or Bills is favored by 10 points, assigning Hochuli increases the variance, allowing the underdog to hang around as the favorite's drives stall out due to flags. • Adrian Hill: The "Under" Specialist. • The Stat: Hill’s crew has a career trend of hitting the "Under" in roughly 55-60% of games, with an even higher percentage in divisional matchups. • The Betting Edge: His crew calls a tighter game on procedural penalties (false starts, illegal formation), which stops the clock less often than major fouls but keeps offenses "behind the sticks," leading to more punts. III. The "Home Cookers" (Protecting the Home Team) Certain referees show a statistical deviation that heavily favors the home team, often attributed to being influenced by crowd noise—or perhaps a tendency to support the "house" advantage. • Brad Allen: The Home Field Guardian. • The Stat: Since 2016, home teams have won straight up in roughly 58-60% of games officiated by Allen, covering the spread at a rate significantly higher than the league average. • The "Management" Angle: In a playoff game where the home team is a major market favorite, Allen is a "safe" assignment. His tendency to let the home crowd influence 50/50 calls (like pass interference) reinforces the home field advantage. • Carl Cheffers: The "Chiefs" Anomaly. • The Stat: Cheffers has been a statistical outlier regarding the Kansas City Chiefs. Analysis has shown his crews call significantly more penalties against the Chiefs than the league average. • The "Management" Angle: This seemingly contradicts the "rigged for the Chiefs" narrative, but it serves a different purpose: Handicapping. If the Chiefs are too dominant, assigning Cheffers creates artificial adversity, ensuring the game remains close (and within the betting spread) rather than a blowout. IV. The "Wild Card": Clete Blakeman • The Profile: Chaos. • The Stat: Blakeman’s crew led the league in 2024 with over 300 total flags. • The "Management" Angle: When Blakeman is assigned, the outcome becomes high-variance. The sheer volume of penalties means the referees have an outsized impact on the result. This is ideal for "trap games" where the league might want to introduce chaos into a matchup that looks like a guaranteed blowout on paper. Conclusion: It's Not a Script, It's an Algorithm Sophisticated bettors do not bet on teams; they bet on combinations of teams and referees. • The Formula: Elite Passing Offense + Bill Vinovich = Bet the Over. • The Formula: Sloppy O-Line + Shawn Hochuli = Bet the Under. If you were the NFL, and you wanted to ensure a "fair" but "entertaining" product, you wouldn't tell a referee to fix a game. You would simply assign the referee whose natural tendencies make the desired outcome (a close game, a high-scoring game, or a home win) statistically probable.
×
×
  • Create New...