Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Week 10: Saints @ Panthers Gameday Thread


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, Mills said:

I agree to a point. Outside of TMac, We still have arguably the worst receiver room in the league. Legette is a certified Dykhead.

This offense should have always been built around speedy wideouts who can get separation to give ole Noodle arm a chance to be successful. He’d still probably throw behind them but at least he wouldn’t have an excuse 

I don’t see that he has one now.  First overall, can’t adapt? Fugetabboutit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Guys defense have year of tape on Canales and Bryce.

This isn’t complicated. Neither are good and the nfl figured them out. 

So if you know Bryce will sink the ship but are essentially forced to play him… in a 3 point game, what do you do? You see what happens when you turn him loose to point guard. 
I can’t blame Canales for that sorry excuse for a football player he is forced to indulge. 
He may be crap too but he needs the rope to prove it with an actual QB. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, strato said:

So if you know Bryce will sink the ship but are essentially forced to play him… in a 3 point game, what do you do? You see what happens when you turn him loose to point guard. 
I can’t blame Canales for that sorry excuse for a football player he is forced to indulge. 
He may be crap too but he needs the rope to prove it with an actual QB. 

When I look at the panthers offense over the past two seasons I know I think “this guy has shown he deserves a chance to pick a qb and run another season with him.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

When I look at the panthers offense over the past two seasons I know I think “this guy has shown he deserves a chance to pick a qb and run another season with him.”

I know what you think. You have said so often enough. I think it needs to be proven with a clean slate and not having to try to drag that fuging 180lb weight around. 
I think what I asked is what is he supposed to do? 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

He accepted the job. You don’t get to wash your hands with a hiring condition.

You are assuming you know the arrangement didn’t include a contingency providing that Bryce was unfixable.

The main justification to condemn him out of hand is to believe Bryce was fixable and he failed. 
If you don’t believe that, and I didn’t, judging him on that is unfair.
 

I know the other arguments. On balance and considering realistic alternatives, I am not sold. I need to see it under conditions more conducive to success than what is in place right now. No biggie. Just think he has a big time losing hand and what the hell can you do if you are in that position? 
I think you try to ride it out and hope you get better circumstances eventually. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, strato said:

You are assuming you know the arrangement didn’t include a contingency providing that Bryce was unfixable.

 

Buddy, listen, you are correct I can’t disprove an unknowable hypothetical. You keep trotting this out like it’s not a logical fallacy. You can’t disprove a negative.

If you want to cloak yourself in made up things I can’t prove are false then more power to you. 

all I’m doing is calling what I see, and i see a coach whos averaging less than two TDs a game on offense for the better part of two seasons.

But yeah maybe the guy who doesn’t have final roster say actually negotiated a secret clause that kicks in after two seasons of eating poo.

Sure thing pal. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fig that attitude with your derisive crap. You ain’t perfect. 
 

Go round and round and your whole case is it was a money grab and Canales is too dumb to get a condition of employment that gives him life after Bryce. When the village football idiot could see that he ain’t t it and can’t be made into an NFL QB, but a pro coach can’t see that  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh please lose the locker room 

https://x.com/scott_fowler/status/1987641052480614589?s=46

Panthers OT Ickey Ekwonu said Carolina's lack of preparation was a factor in 17-7 loss to Saints today. I'm putting a longer quote than usual in here, for context, re: what he said about the Panthers' practices this past week.
Ekwonu: "We just weren't locked into the small details. And you know, a couple guys spoke about it. Coach spoke about it throughout the week. 
"And you can't get days back. You know, if you have a tough day on Thursday, tough day on Friday, or whatever, you can always look forward. But you can't get that day back. 
"So that preparation, or lack thereof, is going to add up. And unfortunately, that just cultivated to what we saw today."

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...