Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Leaders in Missed Tackles


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Shaq is a small piece on the Bills defense. Here he would have had significantly more responsibility which would have opened more opportunities for him to be exposed in the open field. You guys are hopped up on copium suggesting anything else.

I don’t know what these dumb 4chan sayings mean

Rozeboom sucks. A linebacker on the wrong side of thirty with multiple fake ligaments is not a solution.

if you’re stomping your feet because he’d be a marginal improvement then sure whatever point conceded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, electro's horse said:

I don’t know what these dumb 4chan sayings mean

Rozeboom sucks. A linebacker on the wrong side of thirty with multiple fake ligaments is not a solution.

if you’re stomping your feet because he’d be a marginal improvement then sure whatever point conceded. 

Rozeboom and Shaq are irrelevant.

The bigger picture is we have poured an abundance of resources into the offense to the detriment of the defense and our offense can't even outduel a rookie on a rebuilding Saints team.

The only way to correct course defensively is to invest draft capital.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

You’ve got to get to the ball to miss a tackle and I don’t know how much range Shaw even has anymore. It’s not like the bills defense is r a steaming pile.

like yeah Rozeboom is trash I’ve been shitting on him since day one and I’d like for someone to be on this team that I like.

Shaqs best game this year was Canales and his JO buddy didn’t change their audibles from the previous season  

 

Rozebum has great range but being out of position all the time hasn't been much help. I would rather have kept Shaq in hindsight, knowing that Jewell was not going to work out as a replacement. Now, we couldn't have known that was going to transpire and Shaq was coming off a very serious injury.

Still, it would have been nice to have one competent LB in the mix rather than Dumb & Dumber in Rozebum and Wallace. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, frankw said:

I like Shaq but I'm not going to delude myself into believing he wouldn't be out there whiffing on tackles too. Is he an upgrade over Rozeboom? Yeah but at 31 he was never going to save this linebacker room.

no way in hell shaq was going to save our defense or is in any future plans because of his age and recent injuries

but he was willing to come back even on a 1 year vet min deal. he would have been the perfect 1 year stop gap until we could find an eventual replacement and also mentor the younger guys

instead we have just rolled with an even worse option in rozebum and hoped for the best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

no way in hell shaq was going to save our defense or is in any future plans because of his age and recent injuries

but he was willing to come back even on a 1 year vet min deal. he would have been the perfect 1 year stop gap until we could find an eventual replacement and also mentor the younger guys

instead we have just rolled with an even worse option in rozebum and hoped for the best

The overwhelming majority of our roster investments the last few years have been about justifying the Bryce Young trade and selection. All roads lead back to that.

The Panthers have been an up and down franchise but we have not been without success before Tepper came along. And we had always been primarily a defensive team identity wise. We need to get back to what has had them competitive over the years. We need to shore up the defense. And we need to reset at defensive coordinator.

Unfortunately I fear the decision making of our front office remains clouded by their desire to salvage Bryce Young and there is good reason to wonder if they will continue to overcompensate in that aspect instead of moving forward with a methodical approach to making the whole roster more competitive.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DeAngelo Beason said:

I would agree to an extent.  

This isn't bashing Horn, I just didn't realize he was trending so poorly on the tackling front the past two seasons. I do remember a couple of really bad ones this season but not that many. It might be something you would need to sit down and look at each play. Maybe going for broke on a strip or diving in desperation after getting beaten badly?

It's not something I associate with Horn so it was a surprise to see him being that bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

This isn't bashing Horn, I just didn't realize he was trending so poorly on the tackling front the past two seasons. I do remember a couple of really bad ones this season but not that many. It might be something you would need to sit down and look at each play. Maybe going for broke on a strip or diving in desperation after getting beaten badly?

It's not something I associate with Horn so it was a surprise to see him being that bad.

I think you're going down the right path.  He's really, really aggressive and it bites him in the arse from time to time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Khaki Lackey said:

All our DBs, including Jaycee, would look a lot better if we didn't have the worst pass rush in the league

No doubt but that shouldn't have an impact on the missed tackles.

I will say that it is certainly possible that since our LB's and safeties struggle in run support and tackling that perhaps more of these guys are getting back to the CB's than necessary. That's certainly a possibility. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DeAngelo Beason said:

I think you're going down the right path.  He's really, really aggressive and it bites him in the arse from time to time.

Yeah, that would have to be a real breakdown of tape. I will say his first three years in the league were pretty good on the tackling front, so it was a surprise to see those stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...