Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In addition to Evero there's one large change that likely should happen.


Recommended Posts

Just now, PleaseCutStewart said:

McDaniels is not coming here. He will probably get a HC job from another team

Yeah thats kinda what I figured. Consider it a quip more than anything. He was just the first name that came to mind while thinking of a type. 

 

Lots of motions and things to make your dink and dunk work better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

Take the play calling duties from Dave. Much like Bryce its far too up and down. Gets cute at the worst times. 

I don't have a guy in mind though I do love McDaniels offense. If Bryce is your guy then I suppose the best west coast type you can find and plug him in. 

 

In addition pay the offensive line coach whatever he wants. Hes done a wonderful job this year. 

I would fuging love McDaniels.  I seriously doubt Canales would agree to bringing him in, but there’s no doubt, he knows what he’s doing offensively and is a disciple of Shanahan, who in my mind is the best playcaller in the league.  I would be all over McDaniels to get him in here.  But again, I don’t see a) Dave wanting that dynamic and giving up playcalling duties and b) It would probably cost Izdik his job, which Dave also wouldn’t be a fan of.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TylerDurden said:

I would fuging love McDaniels.  I seriously doubt Canales would agree to bringing him in, but there’s no doubt, he knows what he’s doing offensively and is a disciple of Shanahan, who in my mind is the best playcaller in the league.  I would be all over McDaniels to get him in here.  But again, I don’t see a) Dave wanting that dynamic and giving up playcalling duties and b) It would probably cost Izdik his job, which Dave also wouldn’t be a fan of.

Im not super familiar with Izdik tbh. Is he someone Dave is grooming or is he OC in name only and a glorified position coach and Analyst? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

Im not super familiar with Izdik tbh. Is he someone Dave is grooming or is he OC in name only and a glorified position coach and Analyst? 

Im no expert, but it feels like the latter.  Dave has been asked multiple times about allowing him to call plays and to my knowledge he only allowed it for a game in the preseason.  So perhaps they’re grooming him to eventually become that, but it doesn’t feel like it’s for him to eventually do it here.  Prolly more to prepare him to become that elsewhere.  Definitely has felt like he’s more like a QC guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackson113.2 said:

His play calling is what got him his job, might as well fire him in that case..

Well that's typically what gets most every coordinator their HC job if we're being fair. But only certain head coaches have proven they can do it at a high level. 

His main priority is game time management and building the type of locker room culture to implement his teachings across the board. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have to call the season a success given where we were. And have been for too long. 
Meaning it really would be tough to navigate taking power from Canales when the overall arrow is pointing up. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • But that's the point, if the locker room feels that way, then you're going to upset them by still keeping Bryce around and playing him over the Top 10 pick, as opposed to bringing in a vet to start until the rookie is ready. Again, it goes one of 3 ways... 1. Bryce plays well enough to earn an extension 2. Bryce still sucks and we draft his replacement who starts Week 1 with a new QB as his backup 3. Bryce still sucks, we draft his replacement in the 1st, but they start the season backing up a new vet QB who was brought in to be his mentor. With an OUTSIDE chance at a 4th option where Bryce plays well enough to convince the team to let him play out the 5th year option and then make a decision.  Which I can't see it happening, but there is still a non zero chance of that happening I guess. The only way we draft a QB next year and still have Bryce on the roster, is if we're taking someone in the middle rounds hoping to develop them as a long term backup to Bryce.
    • I hear you. But I am not absolving Legette just because he is from my neck of the woods or anything else.  Tge comment was more about the fans uneven application of blame.  I do agree that there is a noticeable disconnect between him and the QB and that he might do better with a more polished and capable delivery man.  Abd don’t feel that they used XL right, or at least how I expected it to look.  And that could be a function of a reticent WB that shies away from that style of attack. I mean it was either him or Canales that pretty much eliminated downfield from the playbook - even while we see guys running free at times. It Could work if they commit to it.  Whoever isn’t committing. 
    • Lot of passion there.  Look, if Bryce plays down to the level that we feel the need to draft a QB high, you don’t think the locker room might be ready for anything that helps them win?   There are s lot of angles to this that could come into play depending on what happens this year. 
×
×
  • Create New...