Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Canalas bring someone else in to call offensive plays?


Recommended Posts

I don’t see how it is supposed to work when Canales has his mini me as OC by title, but is de facto OC. How do you inject a play caller from the outside into that situation? 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, strato said:

I don’t see how it is supposed to work when Canales has his mini me as OC by title, but is de facto OC. How do you inject a play caller from the outside into that situation? 

It would work by bringing in someone competent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It would work by bringing in someone competent.

Not what I was looking for there.  You, I believe, would advocate forcing the issue and getting Canales out if possible. 
 

I am looking at if I am Canales oholding a 6 year contract with 4 years left and just won the division and almost an upset in the playoffs, and has that stadium rocking…

And you want me to give up my autonomy and likely demote or terminate my right hand guy… I would likely dig in my heels. You would have to push it hard. Too hard. You will have big time upset Apple cart.  
 

For me, I can’t see how Idzik is any better at it. We looked at that in preseason and IIRC people were bitching. 
 

But someone bitches about every single thing that is done or not done so who knows….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, strato said:

Not what I was looking for there.  You, I believe, would advocate forcing the issue and getting Canales out if possible. 
 

I am looking at if I am Canales oholding a 6 year contract with 4 years left and just won the division and almost an upset in the playoffs, and has that stadium rocking…

And you want me to give up my autonomy and likely demote or terminate my right hand guy… I would likely dig in my heels. You would have to push it hard. Too hard. You will have big time upset Apple cart.  
 

For me, I can’t see how Idzik is any better at it. We looked at that in preseason and IIRC people were bitching. 
 

But someone bitches about every single thing that is done or not done so who knows….

Well Canales is already a bottom 3 OC and bottom 5 HC. How much worse is it possible to get?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Well Canales is already a bottom 3 OC and bottom 5 HC. How much worse is it possible to get?

Well that just wasn’t the question that I asked. The bottom this and that has been discussed and will be discussed again. 

It is a very similar situation to Bryce. Both their jobs are safe right now as far as I can tell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is how I see it...You can talk to the QB until 15 seconds before the play clock expires.  There are reasons to believe that Canales is spending a lot of time gathering information from those in better position to make the decisions.  Have you noticed how often we break the huddle between 15 and 13 seconds remaining?  I have a theory...

1. Canales is on the sideline.  His view of the field is not as good as the OC, who is sitting in the box in the sky--he can see the defense, spacing, substitutions, etc.  This means that Canales must get information from up top before selecting a play.

2. Canales has to spend time during the week with the defense, special teams, etc. in addition to the offense.  The OC is with the offense all week.  He knows the plays that were run well in practice--he knows the nicks and dings they might be complaining about--he knows their questions and input about certain plays, formations, etc.  Canales may be aware, but not AS aware. 

3.  Canales likes the moniker "QB whisperer."  He may feel more confident being the voice in Bryce's helmet because he is Bryce's mentor. 

Just a theory--but Canales could be the play caller because Bryce is the QB and he is trying to literally whisper into the QB ear.

Edited by MHS831
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Here is how I see it...You can talk to the QB until 15 seconds before the play clock expires.  There are reasons to believe that Canales is spending a lot of time gathering information from those in better position to make the decisions.  Have you noticed how often we break the huddle between 15 and 13 seconds remaining?  I have a theory...

1. Canales is on the sideline.  His view of the field is not as good as the OC, who is sitting in the box in the sky--he can see the defense, spacing, substitutions, etc.  This means that Canales must get information from up top before selecting a play.

2. Canales has to spend time during the week with the defense, special teams, etc. in addition to the offense.  The OC is with the offense all week.  He knows the plays that were run well in practice--he knows the nicks and dings they might be complaining about--he knows their questions and input about certain plays, formations, etc.  Canales may be aware, but not AS aware. 

3.  Canales likes the moniker "QB whisperer."  He may feel more confident being the voice in Bryce's helmet because he is Bryce's mentor. 

Just a theory--but Canales could be the play caller because Bryce is the QB and he is trying to literally whisper into the QB ear.

You one of those guys that watched The Sopranos for the Tony and Dr Melli scenes? Pretty deep psychological motivations there. 
 

That headset cutoff, that came up in a discussion about pre snap. The claim was the defense waits until Canales is muted to show their hand, leaving Bryce with dirty underwear a lot of times. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strato said:

Well that just wasn’t the question that I asked. The bottom this and that has been discussed and will be discussed again. 

It is a very similar situation to Bryce. Both their jobs are safe right now as far as I can tell. 

I did answer your initial question with my intial answer.

Also, you are aware this already happened? He didn't have any say in getting Evero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I did answer your initial question with my intial answer.

Also, you are aware this already happened? He didn't have any say in getting Evero.

We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it. 
This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment.
I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now. 

Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement. 
Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work. 
Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not. 
 

Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out. 
And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO. 
 

 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

My translator says something quite a bit different.

I think Canales stays as OC and it ends up getting him fired after the 2026 season.

The whole thing is setting itself up that way.  Run it back and the law of averages says about 4-5 wins.  I think at a minimum Tepper would force Canales to hire a rock star OC.  But he’d probably just fire everyone.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

The whole thing is setting itself up that way.  Run it back and the law of averages says about 4-5 wins.  I think at a minimum Tepper would force Canales to hire a rock star OC.  But he’d probably just fire everyone.

I watched the Morgan presser just now. The Evero extension was to align the contract with Canales’.  Whatever that really means. Morgan sort of made a point of putting it that way.  
 

You could infer a fair amount from that move.
For one, it lines up with the thing you guys are saying. Total reboot. Contracts are aligned. 

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have no evidence that Canales is a forward thinker who is willing to make uncomfortable decisions for the betterment of the team. He seems very non confrontational, those types of people won’t make changes unless forced to. Dan Morgan is the same mold as Canales. Which means if changes are made, it’ll only come from one man. That man is David Tepper. But it most likely won’t be until next season. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...