Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

This whole "what if WR is the best player available" has quickly  changed in to a decree that it will be and acting as if you need to convince fans in order to make it happen. 

Just say you want a WR. This isnt  logical anymore.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, csx said:

This whole "what if WR is the best player available" has quickly  changed in to a decree that it will be and acting as if you need to convince fans in order to make it happen. 

Just say you want a WR. This isnt  logical anymore.

No, I have been consistent. Take the BPA. You don't reach down over a position to take a lower graded player out of a sense of need, or some decidedly arbitrary notion that you can't draft a position three times in a row. That's why I have debated WR. Don't reach down! That reeks of desperation which doesn't lead to the desired results.

No one knows how the draft will fall, so all we have to deal with is "ifs."

I've consistently said that you follow your board. It's that simple. If your BPA is OT, take him. If it's safety, take him. If it's LB, take him. If it's EDGE, take him. If it's WR, take him. It's that simple.

 

Edited by TD alt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, csx said:

This whole "what if WR is the best player available" has quickly  changed in to a decree that it will be and acting as if you need to convince fans in order to make it happen. 

Just say you want a WR. This isnt  logical anymore.

The simple "BPA drafting" is a complete myth.  If you believe it then it says you dont look at the positional value, dont look at draft depth and dont look at roster make up.  There is no way on Gods green earth that at pick 19 the 5th/6th wr is going to be the BPA.   Thats simply moronic to think.  If we go that route I hope the FO doesnt try the old "piss on my leg and tell me its raining" explanation.  Simply say its imperative we evaluate bryce and giving him another weapon helps us in that process.

 

If that happens and I am EE I would be losing my mind if we pass on a starting safety or Dtackle depth

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

The simple "BPA drafting" is a complete myth.  If you believe it then it says you dont look at the positional value, dont look at draft depth and dont look at roster make up.  There is no way on Gods green earth that at pick 19 the 5th/6th wr is going to be the BPA.   Thats simply moronic to think.  If we go that route I hope the FO doesnt try the old "piss on my leg and tell me its raining" explanation.  Simply say its imperative we evaluate bryce and giving him another weapon helps us in that process.

 

If that happens and I am EE I would be losing my mind if we pass on a starting safety or Dtackle depth

It is not; I don't care how many times you say it. You obviously don't believe a word that Dan Morgan says. But if it makes you comfortable to believe it's a myth, then believe on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

The simple "BPA drafting" is a complete myth.  If you believe it then it says you dont look at the positional value, dont look at draft depth and dont look at roster make up.  There is no way on Gods green earth that at pick 19 the 5th/6th wr is going to be the BPA.   Thats simply moronic to think.  If we go that route I hope the FO doesnt try the old "piss on my leg and tell me its raining" explanation.  Simply say its imperative we evaluate bryce and giving him another weapon helps us in that process.

 

If that happens and I am EE I would be losing my mind if we pass on a starting safety or Dtackle depth

Honestly, you don't listen to a word I've said either. A board, WHERE THE BPA comes from, IS GOING TO HAVE POSITIONAL VALUE BUILT IN! Damn, man!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

The simple "BPA drafting" is a complete myth.  If you believe it then it says you dont look at the positional value, dont look at draft depth and dont look at roster make up.  There is no way on Gods green earth that at pick 19 the 5th/6th wr is going to be the BPA.   Thats simply moronic to think.  If we go that route I hope the FO doesnt try the old "piss on my leg and tell me its raining" explanation.  Simply say its imperative we evaluate bryce and giving him another weapon helps us in that process.

 

If that happens and I am EE I would be losing my mind if we pass on a starting safety or Dtackle depth

We don't need another first round WR to evaluate Bryce Young. You could give him a young Jerry Rice Randy Moss and Justin Jefferson and he would still struggle to lead the group to a top 20 passing offense because he simply cannot utilize the entire field consistently.

All we're going to end up with by drafting another first round wide receiver is a disgruntled WR room. Because one there are not that many touches to go around and two the touches that will be available maybe half of them will result in good to great ball placement. And the bulk of them will be thrown at or behind the line of scrimmage.

If the FO goes WR at 19 all involved might as well go ahead and start looking at other job opportunities down the line.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want.

Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR.

Tate- Gone

Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19

Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout 

Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd.

KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone.

Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

We don't need another first round WR to evaluate Bryce Young. You could give him a young Jerry Rice Randy Moss and Justin Jefferson and he would still struggle to lead the group to a top 20 passing offense because he simply cannot utilize the entire field consistently.

All we're going to end up with by drafting another first round wide receiver is a disgruntled WR room. Because one there are not that many touches to go around and two the touches that will be available maybe half of them will result in good to great ball placement. And the bulk of them will be thrown at or behind the line of scrimmage.

If the FO goes WR at 19 all involved might as well go ahead and start looking at other job opportunities down the line.

First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But...

Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team.

If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing. 

If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TD alt said:

First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But...

Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team.

If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing. 

If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.

Brother you've been WR driven for going on almost two decades now. 

No need for us to discuss further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Panthers 1st pick should be about maximum value and immediate impact. That would be either S LB OT or DL. We also have a looming catastrophe at C if anyone goes down to injury. Legitimately this should be talked about more idk how some of you have completely erased the sight of Matt Paradis and Pat Elflein from your memory banks.

There's no reason we cannot come out of this draft addressing virtually all of the above in some capacity. That is how Morgan and Tillis will earn their salary.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MHS has posted this same thing with different words in about 3 threads now. It’s great content and it’s largely indisputable. But you can do this same style write up for every position in the 2026 class. This is just a fancy way of showing an anti OT hard on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
    • He is a talented player with a lot of potential but ultimately he is a legend in his own mind and the minds of those who attack on his behalf when people pinpoint inconvenient truths. I could see people being so hostile over him if he actually had that kind of juice but he doesn't. Even in the Heat win LaMelo took 31 shots and was 40%. If not for Coby White's late heroics we would have lost in regulation. The reality is we do have pieces in place to compete in the playoffs but in year 6 and with a supermax and a salary that is only going to increase over the next few years LaMelo Ball simply does not look like a franchise centerpiece that you can go on multiple playoff runs with. Look at someone like Trae Young. His team moved on. And he actually took them to the conference finals. The Hornets are at a crossroads. Very tough conversations need to be had in the offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...