Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Several teams at top of draft seem interested in Cam


MHS831

Recommended Posts

From the ESPN3.com footage, Whisenhunt shook his hand after the workout, and Tennessee asked to see a few extra passes.

Could mean absolutely nothing, but both want a QB. Throw them in with Buffalo (rumored to like Newton) and Cincinnati (Lewis was in attendance) and that makes 4 teams in the top 8 picks who couild be interested and might make a trade offer.

All it takes is 1. I would love to know what Elway Fox had to say about it. They were there and seemed interested. Fairley I am sure.

By the way, Fairley looked awefully good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you believe that to be true if if it generated our interest as well and we take him instead of trade?? :)

I trust the braintrust to do the right thing. From what I know now, after his performance today, the only way I would take him is if we traded down and he fell. I feel he was pressing a little, in fairness. Lotta eyes on him as well as pressure. If I am the GM, the red flags did not go away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how Cam haters are so happy that other teams are looking at him but will not admit we are as well.

Why would we not admit it? We are interested in him. But we have openly said that we are looking at 8 or so players. Why do the nut-huggers think its Cam or fold the tent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I trust the braintrust to do the right thing. From what I know now, after his performance today, the only way I would take him is if we traded down and he fell. I feel he was pressing a little, in fairness. Lotta eyes on him as well as pressure. If I am the GM, the red flags did not go away.

But you expect other teams to give up future draft picks to get him?? We are just as desperate for a QB as anybody else and you don't want him at no extra cost, yet you expect these teams to trade up. Doesn't make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought he threw a couple curls and then it ended? What routes did we ask for?

I am pretty sure he threw 4 passes. Some curls and some deep posts maybe. He definitely threw 4 extra passes. I can't remember what the other routes were off the top of my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess its good to know that some NFL teams realize you need a good QB to be competitive. Maybe we can trade the pick to AZ pick up a LB or DT that will hopefully be on our roster long enough to wear a Panthers hat while sitting in the stands at the next AZ superbowl appearance. That would be sweet. /endrant

Im not sold on Any QB in this draft but I'm absolutely sick of almost 20 years of mediocrity from other teams scraps at the QB position. This may be (hopefully) the last time we draft first for another 20 years or so. Time to take a shot at a true franchise qb.

Meh, Im just frustrated after years of good defense and crap offence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...