Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The players are losing it...


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

This is an article about the shots that kevin burnette took at rodger goodell...

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=6229285

With the comments from Petersen and now this it's amazing to me how detached these guys are from reality. He talks about getting fined for doing drugs or not being an "upstanding citizen"...uh, who here works somewhere that if you fail a drug test you get fired? How many of you work somewhere that if you get a DUI you get fired or at the very least punished? These guys have no clue what real life is like bc most of them have always had people bending over backwards for them...from high school to the pros. I love what goodell has done and I love his message to players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goodell's full of it. He's a liar. You're a blatant liar. 'It's our league, it's we, we love the players, we want the league,' but what have you done for the players? What have you done, in all honesty, to improve the game, besides fine guys, besides take money away from guys, besides change a game that you've never played? ... He's done nothing to improve the game.

Put the cry baby doing a construction job or some other type of manual labor. I'll bet he'd change his tune REAL QUICK!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get this comments on 'taking the money' wtf? but I do agree on these dumba*ss rule changes it's getting ridiculous .

The rule changes were to promote player safety, aka what the players bitch and moan about.

Then they change their tune saying they would rather have players injured for bad hits because they dont want to be fined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im still behind the players. I can understand the owners point of view also but I think this could have been handled entirely better from the start. The "take our league back" , billion dollars, 18 game , reduce percentage offer was a slap in the face as far as initial proposals. There way it started there was no way this deal was going to be done peacefully. Everyone involved played a part in this though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh that objection was ridiculous. He's making rule changes because of recent research done on concussions. The line between dangerous and acceptable is becoming clearer. The only reason he's 'taking money from the players' is because of these new rules. I can see the 18 game season thing contradicting with player safety, but that's not the point that was raised. A bit harsh imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't buy the "18 games is a hazard to player safety" line at all. How much did injuries go up when the season went to 16 games? Is 18 the magic number where people's bones and joints crumble into dust? I think it's ridiculous. And sure they should include the extra 2 weeks worth of work into the pay. When it goes to 18 games, the contracts should go up by roughly 1/9th.

And the argument I've heard about record books...there couldn't possibly be a lamer excuse. They already did it in the 70s when they extended it to 16 games. There's no legitimate reason why they can't do it again 40 years later. It'll just be the beginning of another new era. It's time for one anyway. People already say "well it was a different league back then. There's more focus on passing now, the elite RB is dying, blahblahblah". Time to mark another crossroads in the history of the NFL. Let the new era of the NFL begin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most teams play starters 3 quarters in the 3rd preseason game and 1 quarter in the 4th preseason game so we are really only talking about adding 60 more minutes of football with an 18 game season.

As a fan, preseason game tickets cost the same as the normal game tickets so I'd rather see a game that counts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the game of football and do appreciate safety measures that are enforced for the players. I believe they should have the best health care . What I simply do not understand is how people who who are paid millions of $$ for a job they enjoy with all the other perks, feel they are entitled to and demand a percentage of the owners profit. Yes it is a contact sport that could result in injury, but it is a job. Police Officers and Firemen's lives are on the line everyday, should they demand a percentage of Municipal collection? Guys it is your chosen profession and compared to most of us you are paid well to do it. If you don't think so check the employment section. Play Ball!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...