Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"We're 60 percent of the way along." - Rivera


Hoenheim

Recommended Posts

I find it interesting they say that wide receiver is one of our most glaring needs..

If Steve Smith leaves......we have 3 sophomore WRs that combined for less than 1000 yards of offense. WR, despite our excitement is normally a 3 yr process and many hopeful stars fizzle along the way. Like a Colbert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh, so many holes yadda, yadda, yadda...go with a weak QB! All these articles are the same. The Panthers suck so they have to take a QB from a lackluster class, even though the WR, DT and even DB talent is 10x deeper and talented this year.

Yet, it makes perfect sense to go with the glamour QB position with all of these moron sports jounalists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why I read all these things.....

they commented there isn't a single strength on the roster? Only someone who doesn't watch Carolina would say that.

A healthy OL and healthy LB corp should be in consideration for best in the NFC.

people flat out don't watch 2 win teams.....and therefore they paint (or in this case, write) with broad and dumb strokes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh, so many holes yadda, yadda, yadda...go with a weak QB! All these articles are the same. The Panthers suck so they have to take a QB from a lackluster class, even though the WR, DT and even DB talent is 10x deeper and talented this year.

Yet, it makes perfect sense to go with the glamour QB position with all of these moron sports jounalists.

Understand what you mean, but the group they have there aren't morons.

I may disagree with them on this point, but all of the guys they have on there are people Id say are worth listening to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it interesting they say that wide receiver is one of our most glaring needs..

I can see it.

We've got no consistent receivers except Smith. As awesome as he was, it's a fair statement to say his best days are behind him and there's lots of trade talk for him too. If we get a CBA, I'm sure he'll get shopped out.

Still need a QB to throw to whoever they go after though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh, so many holes yadda, yadda, yadda...go with a weak QB! All these articles are the same. The Panthers suck so they have to take a QB from a lackluster class, even though the WR, DT and even DB talent is 10x deeper and talented this year.

Yet, it makes perfect sense to go with the glamour QB position with all of these moron sports jounalists.

I fail to understand your logic here. You are saying that it is stupid to take a QB early in a draft where there aren't many high potential QB's. Instead we should draft a WR, DT, or DB in the first round because there are so many available.

If I felt DT was our biggest need and there were only 2 good looking DT's in this draft THEN I would suggest going for one in the first round. If we needed a QB and there were a large amount of talented QB's then I would assume there would be quality left in the later rounds.

PS In last years draft Dareus would have been lucky to be the 3rd DT taken.

And PP7 would probably not gone before Eric Berry.

Fact is anyone we take at #1 in this draft is a reach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fail to understand your logic here. You are saying that it is stupid to take a QB early in a draft where there aren't many high potential QB's. Instead we should draft a WR, DT, or DB in the first round because there are so many available.

If I felt DT was our biggest need and there were only 2 good looking DT's in this draft THEN I would suggest going for one in the first round. If we needed a QB and there were a large amount of talented QB's then I would assume there would be quality left in the later rounds.

PS In last years draft Dareus would have been lucky to be the 3rd DT taken.

And PP7 would probably not gone before Eric Berry.

Fact is anyone we take at #1 in this draft is a reach.

I don't think Patrick Peterson is.

Dareus? Probably not either, but I'm more sure of Peterson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think that depends more on how high our pick is. If we have the 1st, 2nd or even 3rd pick i think we are drafting a QB rather than shopping FA market for a QB1. Curious if we’d be reluctant to start a rookie QB week 1 though. 
    • Hurney 2.0 and Fitts were so bad I don't know if it was intentional or they were that abysmally clueless. Fittershits panicked repeatedly being on the back end of positional runs while Hurney couldn't evaluate anyone outside of the 1st.  I can't figure out why Plummer still has a jersey. There's no reason. Dalton brings nothing to the table. If another QB gets cut that has given a glimmer of anything better than what we have, we should look, and that goes for every position.  I cant get over how much different this team could have been with a competent GM and having accepted the Rams offer for Burns. This franchise could have gone in a totally different direction. 
    • I thought tanking wasn't actually a thing and we were firmly against it though?
×
×
  • Create New...