Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

D. Smith Added to Unio-er, NFLPA* Legal Team


mav1234

Recommended Posts

So the players are filing a motion to add D. Smith to their legal team.

This is important because it allows him to be present during settlement negotiations. Otherwise, he didn't have the authority to be present since the NFLPA* is no longer a union. PFT also reports it could signify a reduced role for Kessler, who is a bit... "abrasive" as they put it. If this is true, it would be a good thing because Kessler is pretty strongly opinionated relating to the antitrust stuff.

From http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/08/players-file-motion-to-add-demaurice-smith-to-legal-team/:

Jason La Canfora of NFL Network reports that the players have filed a motion to add Smith as a member of the legal team. ... an obvious purpose in this instance would be to allow Smith to actively be involved in settlement talks without having to worry about the argument that the NFLPA* is still behaving as a union.

My take... Adding your trade association head to your legal team so he can be present at negotiations like he would be if it was a bargaining sessions with a union doesn't strike me as being a particularly compelling case for the union really being decertified.

The conspiracy theorist in me thinks this was the plan all along, because D. Smith being a lawyer is a real good way to make sure your executive can be on your legal team...

Part of me really hopes this was done so that a deal CAN get done, and that D. Smith is more moderate than some other members of his legal team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

I'll be honest: Adding your trade association head to your legal team so he can be present at negotiations like he would be if it was a bargaining sessions with a union doesn't strike me as being a particularly compelling case for the union really being decertified.

The conspiracy theorist in me thinks this was the plan all along, because D. Smith being a lawyer is a real good way to make sure your executive can be on your legal team...

Part of me really hopes this was done so that a deal CAN get done, and that D. Smith is more moderate than some other members of his legal team.

Link to comment

PFT also reports it could signify a reduced role for Kessler, who is a bit... "abrasive" as they put it. If this is true, it would be a good thing because Kessler is pretty strongly opinionated relating to the antitrust stuff.

This is making news out of nothing. More likely, the addition of Smith simply makes sense if the sides are going to enter mediation for a settlement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is making news out of nothing. More likely, the addition of Smith simply makes sense if the sides are going to enter mediation for a settlement.

Speculation both ways, no one really knows what to expect from the NFLPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nothing wrong with starting to look for bodies early. It's a long injury filled season. I doubt we get through unscathed. 
    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...