Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are the right pieces in place?


Marguide

Recommended Posts

Assuming the Panthers are strongly considering a QB at number 1, do we have the right supporting elements in place for early success?

Those elements include:

1) A solid offensive line

2) A strong running game

3) Dependable wide receivers and TE's that can get separation

4) A staff willing to tweak the playbook to maximize the chance of success

5) Patience

How do we stack up in these areas? Do you view the environment for a young QB as better or worse than what we had last year?

These questions are probably as big of a part of the draft evaluation process as the questions about individual players.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im all for drafting a QB but just like last year with JC I am completely against starting a rookie QB. Most people disagreed with me then also because JC was "NFL ready"

How did that turn out?

I've been sayin I told you so a lot today. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It still pisses me off when I hear "The Panthers can take anybody, they have so many holes to fill"

No we friggin don't.

Agree. Pick up a vet WR if SS goes, and I think we are set.

To me, we could not have a better situation for taking our choice of QB's at number 1. It is rare to have the first pick and have a good supporting cast for a rookie QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh. Depends how you define success. Do you mean sucking for a year, then maybe just missing the playoffs next year IF our guy takes a major step forward? If so, sure, that's what is in place.

We do not have the defense to completely carry poor quarterback play, as we saw with JC (our running game was clicking just fine in many of those games).

With a good veteran presence I could see this team competing for a playoff spot. If the team has to deal with another rookie learning the position in the NFL I think we'll be pretty bad next year, but at least I think we have the right coaches to help them improve through that year on this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what do you guys mean we don't have many holes to fill?

First off we need a QB, and if we draft Newton in no way is he going to be ready for success by next season. If Steve Smith is traded all we have at WR is LaFell, Gettis, and Armanti. We are very thin at WR if he is traded and dont have a viable number one who puts fear in other team's defenses. There is no depth at the o-line and we need a starting RG. Geoff Schwartz played decent last year but he is someone who should be depth and not a starter. Bernadeau was awful last year and Gary Williams does absolutly nothing for me. Jeremy Shockey is no guarantee at the TE spot.

On defense I feel Brayton is going to be cut. That leaves Johnson (if we bring him back), Hardy, and Brown at DE. Once again there is not a lot of depth there. I like Neblett and Landri but I don't like either as starters, I don't think we have a starting DT on the team. There is absolutly no depth at CB and Godfrey is not a starting caliber safety. Behind Godfrey and Martin there isn't much either, hopefully Pugh can develop into something.

So I don't get how you guys can say we don't have a lot of holes to fill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course we have some holes. Every team has holes and spots they need to beef up.

Green Bay won it all, but yet they would love to have our RB's. If you want to see holes, look at Washington's roster.

The point is, we probably have fewer holes on offense than most teams that have the 1st pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To maintain consistency, I will provide my answers in the range of 1 to 5.

1. 3.5: I think we have more than half the line sewn up (Gross, Wharton, and Kalil) but the other parts are completely up in the air. Otah's health and our lack of a quality guard make it less than a sure thing.

2. 4: The line is better at run blocking, and we have some great running backs.

3. 2: Receivers are young and haven't proven enough and our only veteran is Smitty who may want out. The tight ends have never been pressed on to receive and Shockey is never healthy or great for a young quarterback.

4. N/A This is a new staff with no track record of anything.

5. 3: No real established starter, but Rivera will get some time to protect a player if he wants.

As landing spots for potential quarterbacks go, it's not bad, and it may be better after we can sign some free agents. Whenever that happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our problem is we lack depth, this team has no depth and you cant get all of your pieces in one offseason. there is no depth at WR, O-Line, D-Line, Secondary. It is awful how little of depth we have and we dont even have a second round draft pick. We have a bit to go before we are talking playoffs again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...