Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nelson imposing forced mediation


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

The owners didn't want forced mediation by the courts because the mediator will have power to make decisions and the owners don't want to be told what to do.

What does this mean? It means it will be forcefully resolved to BOTH sides disgust very soon. The mediator will listen to both sides and if they are refusing to budge the mediator will make a decision for them and that's that. Its been done before and this judge isn't going to screw around apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The owners didn't want forced mediation by the courts because the mediator will have power to make decisions and the owners don't want to be told what to do.

What does this mean? It means it will be forcefully resolved to BOTH sides disgust very soon. The mediator will listen to both sides and if they are refusing to budge the mediator will make a decision for them and that's that. Its been done before and this judge isn't going to screw around apparently.

Thanks for the explanation..:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what does this mean?

verb (used without object)

1. to engage in thought or contemplation; reflect.

2. to engage in transcendental meditation, devout religious contemplation, or quiescent spiritual introspection.

–verb (used with object)

3. to consider as something to be done or effected; intend; purpose: to meditate revenge.

;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm trying to be as pragmatic and as un reactionary as possible. And once again multiple things can be true  His draft last year was disastrously terrible. X looks like an absolute bust. Brooks hasn't played. Wallace looks like a miss. But demani needs more pt, cws is solid and Coker has shown promise This draft cannot be judged after 2 games esp with a dc who doesn't want to play them. But tmac looks legit. Princely has promise. The rest is a ?  Has he made mistakes? Undoubtedly.  Is the roster better than it was 2 years ago? I'd say yes. I'd say our biggest problems are still the ones we had 2 years ago - Bryce and evero.  And as I've said before, at least he hasn't traded any future picks. Yet.  So IMHO Morgan is a mixed bag but not a total bust. Yet.
    • I'd rather have a raffle to pick a random fan to start at QB than see Bryce trot out there again. That actually sounds wildly entertaining. I'd actually MUCH rather have that. LOL 
    • I think being out on Dan is shortsighted; here are the two immediate reasons that stick out to me. 1) Inherited a grossly undersized QB with no real tangible physical traits that offset his size that the prior offensive staff did not want, who appears to be an all-time bust. Bryce isn't ''elite'' in any physical category, athleticism, arm strength, nothing, even his ''superpower'' aka his processing, does not show up. Not to mention that he is in his 3rd year and is still built like an HS senior. 2) The roster was terrible, the fact that we have halfway established some depth on both sides of the ball is commendable considering we are at the top of his 2nd year at the helm; we have not seen bad contracts handed out, and we've seen relatively smart trades. Even the Thielen one, because he's 35 and we got 4th round value for a guy who was not part of the long-term plans, did we miss him these past two games...sure. However, we were not a playoff team with him anyway.
×
×
  • Create New...