Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is the huddle going to eventually become a cult/commune?


Jase

Recommended Posts

To me, it displays some telltale warning signs.

-Group is united by one single-minded theme or agenda

-Group is mostly men, women are used primarily for procreation (boo you will find this out in a few years)

-A faction of members display a survivalist streak which will eventually evolve into a group militia.

-Group is organized into a hierarchical class system with a distinct leader and a slightly lower nobility class ruling over the workers.

Zod, if you're a planning type, I would start looking at real estate in the mountains if I were you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, it displays some telltale warning signs.

-Group is united by one single-minded theme or agenda

-Group is mostly men, women are used primarily for procreation (boo you will find this out in a few years)

-A faction of members display a survivalist streak which will eventually evolve into a group militia.

-Group is organized into a hierarchical class system with a distinct leader and a slightly lower nobility class ruling over the workers.

Zod, if you're a planning type, I would start looking at real estate in the mountains if I were you.

BITCH-like-im-scared.jpg?imageSize=Medium&generatorName=Victory-Baby

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, it displays some telltale warning signs.

-Group is united by one single-minded theme or agenda

-Group is mostly men, women are used primarily for procreation (boo you will find this out in a few years)

-A faction of members display a survivalist streak which will eventually evolve into a group militia.

-Group is organized into a hierarchical class system with a distinct leader and a slightly lower nobility class ruling over the workers.

Zod, if you're a planning type, I would start looking at real estate in the mountains if I were you.

This is just Jase's Broke Back Mountain fantasy he is hoping comes to fruition.

Bunch of guys living on a mountain together. Sound awesome :cornut::shocked:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's nip this in the bud right now. The huddle started out as a single, blank domain. It was very warm and welcoming. Then, over time, it rapidly expanded and cooled, causing what we now call "the huddle" to be. It is constantly expanding, even right now. There was no creator, only a dictator of the masses.

/Big Bang.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...