-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
One could fall, but doubtful. I am thinking a free agent who can't find a home or a player who is cut after the draft--something like that. The draft is not deep at DT. I do like the rookie I posted who could be a third round option. I love high motor DTs who can pressure the passer. -
that is it--a great athlete who has never really had to apply himself in things like preparation or developing a football I Q. just has always been way better than everyone else. There is a point and time when everyone around you is a great athlete. The point here is to take the thinking away from him. I image all the DCs who have had him have tried to "Swiss Army knife" him into a state of confusion. A confused (as opposed to reactive) player is not running 4.39. They get slower. He does not have the background or acumen to be a Swiss Army knife--like you say, he needs to "see the ball, get the ball." The point here is just that. Give him one thing to do in some situations, and he will get faster. I am not willing to take an athlete like that and say "he sucks" when there is a way to get the most out of him. That is what good coaches do. Until then, we should not label him. That is what bad coaches do.
-
I kinda see it as the same as any other position of arguable need. The thing is, I don't see any DT that may be available as the BPA at 19, but you never know.
-
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.