Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lunch Hour Pregunta


Panthro

Recommended Posts

If I eat lunch at my desk does that count for me taking a lunch? If I come in at 8...eat my sammich...do I count it as a working lunch? I can't work more than 40 hours a week per my contract. I also don't want to work more and not be compensated for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sit at my desk and I also answer the phones during lunch.

Pretty much our whole office sits in the conference room and eats together everyday around 1130. I don't eat until about sometime between 1 and 230, so I always sit at my desk unless I'm going out somewhere.

Just getting ready to eat my sarad right now and read this MMQB article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I eat lunch at my desk then I usually just count the time that I spent eating (and simultaneously browsing the huddle) as non-work time. But when I at at my desk I'll usually only take 15 minutes or so. So instead of 9:00-6:00 with a one hour lunch break I'll work 9:00-5:30 or something. If you work straight through while you're eating lunch then yeah you're still working. I never get a week that's just 40 hours though, so it really doesn't matter for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too tried to eat lunch at work but it gives a good break up to the day when you get to leave and eat. I eat with the same 2-3 coworkers everyday and we usually go out to eat, costing between 8-10 dollars a day.

I was thinking about buying a mini fridge for my office thus making eating at work and brining my lunch easier because it opens up options for me but I haven't made that move just yet.

I love fast food but I don't get to eat it year round so when I do I usually go all out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I eat lunch at my desk then I usually just count the time that I spent eating (and simultaneously browsing the huddle) as non-work time. But when I at at my desk I'll usually only take 15 minutes or so. So instead of 9:00-6:00 with a one hour lunch break I'll work 9:00-5:30 or something. If you work straight through while you're eating lunch then yeah you're still working. I never get a week that's just 40 hours though, so it really doesn't matter for me.

When I started at this company I was a temp and was strictly 40 hours.

Now I'm a normal, salaried employee and haven't seen a 40 hour work week in a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if eating a sammich is considered work, then your sammich is too big...

but yeah, I would count it as being on duty if you're at your desk/answering phones/posting on the huddle...

Id rather be on the Huddle talking to you guys than forcing awkward conversation with the miserable people I work with.

Well, there is one guy I talk to a lot, but I waste work-time for that :)

Plus, there isn't really anywhere I could go...I mean I guess I could eat on the patio by myself but meh. I drove to get my food today (I usually bring my runch since Ive been trying to eat healthier) so just getting out for 15 mins or so does it for me.

I don't mind eating and answering phones/huddling though. Pays off on those days when I leave and go out to eat for like 2 hours. We do timecards but Im paid the same amount anyways...pretty much pointless to do them, but it always says 30 mins for lunch regardless of how long I take

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saints trade WR Shaheed to Seahawks Seahawks get: WR Rashid Shaheed Saints get: 2026 fourth-round pick, 2026 fifth-round pick Seahawks' grade: A- Saints' grade: B+ One of the NFL's hottest passing teams just got better. The Seahawks currently rank third in EPA per dropback (0.25) and first in success rate on dropbacks (53%). And now they are adding Shaheed in a move that makes sense both on the field and in terms of where the Seahawks are as a franchise. Shaheed, 27, is averaging 1.8 yards per route run this season. But I think that sells him short because that number is down a bit from his career average entering this year (2.0) and he's been playing a role that includes running fewer vertical routes (34%) compared to last year (44%). Shaheed also has consistently posted above-average open scores in ESPN's receiver score metrics, including a 63 this season that ranks 28th among wide receivers. As a complement to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, I expect Shaheed will run downfield more often and be a bigger threat in that role than rookie Tory Horton was. When Cooper Kupp returns, he and Shaheed will make for a nice pair of secondary threats behind one of the best receivers in the league in Smith-Njigba. This is the time to strike for the Seahawks. FPI gives Seattle an 84% chance to make the playoffs and a 5% shot at winning the Super Bowl. This addition helps boost their chances without mortgaging their future the way the Colts did in the Sauce Gardner trade. Shaheed is a pending free agent but given the leverage of the moment for the Seahawks and their need I think they ought to be plenty willing to pay the cost. Shaheed is young enough to where if Seattle doesn't retain him he should sign a free agent contract that would yield Seattle a compensatory pick -- if the Seahawks don't nullify that pick with signings of their own. Because the Seahawks currently have $79 million in cap space next year, per OverTheCap, getting that compensatory pick is not guaranteed. The Saints are not rolling in cap space the way the Seahawks are -- and thus would land a compensatory pick for Shaheed -- but they got more draft capital this way than they otherwise would have. Considering New Orleans' 1-8 record, this should have been an easy decision.
    • I thought victory Mondays was pretty standard 
×
×
  • Create New...