Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Clausen headed for infamous club


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

CHARLOTTE, N.C. – Great stat from Elias Sports Bureau by way of ESPN Stats and Information.

With it looking like the Panthers will take Cam Newton with the first pick in tonight’s draft, Jimmy Clausen has a chance to join some pretty unflattering company. The Panthers used a second-round pick on Clausen last year.

Since 1970, only two teams have drafted a quarterback within the top 50 picks in back-to-back drafts. Both came in 1982 and 1983. In 1982, the Bills drafted Matt Kofler at No. 48 overall. In 1983, they followed by taking Jim Kelly at No. 14. Kelly went to the United States Football league before joining the Bills in 1986.

In 1982, the Baltimore Colts draft Art Schlichter at No. 4. In 1983, they took John Elway at No. 1. Elway never played for the Colts and eventually was traded to Denver.

But the moral of this story is that you don’t want to be the guy taken in the year before your team turns around and uses a higher pick on a quarterback. Heck, the true moral of the story is you don’t want to be Schlichter or Kofler.

Looks like Clausen’s about to join that club.

Read more: http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcsouth/post/_/id/20506/clausen-headed-for-infamous-club

So this means Cam is the next Kelly/Elway, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newton will come in and immediately be given the #2 position....right behind the Vet we acquire to play until Newton and/or Clausen develops.

Clausen has the edge in having played college in a Pro Style system and having played and knowing the Carolina offensive scheme. Actually, the 'Carolina scheme' just might be a whole lot different under Rivera, so Clausen might not have THAT much of an advantage regarding 'knowing the system'. Both QBs will benefit from our new QB coach, but the difference will be in how quickly Newton learns and grasps Carolina's offense.

I feel a little sorry for Clausen - he got thrown under the proverbial bus, asked to step in when he wasn't ready last season. Unless Carolina wants the same thing to happen to Newton, he shouldn't make it onto the field at least until mid-season this year, if then. Look at Aaron Rodgers - he spent several seasons behind Favre, learning the system and being given the chance to develop before being given the reins. Newton is going to need some development and time to be developed further.

The guy I really feel sorry for, though, is Tony Pike. The guy actually has some skill, but with Newton and most assuredly a Vet coming in, he has been relegated to Practice Squad at best on this team and if lucky signs with another team and gets the chance he didn't get here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly believe Moore will be given the starting role. I think he'll do well too. Not great... but decent enough to win. As I said in another thread... it's 50/50 that Newton comes in as the starter.

Jimmy... well... we just need to eat the money spent on him and cut him loose to free up a slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...