Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Greg Salas is the pick at 98!!!!!! *he hopes*


cheynehowell

Recommended Posts

This guy would be a perfect compliment to Gettis and Lafell. Being a Hawaii fan myself (My cousin is a volleyball all american on hawaii) I could not help but notice how amzing this guy was. Unbelieveable hands. Always finds a way to get open.

This is the next great slot receiver. Not a burner but a guy who will across the middle and move the chains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy would be a perfect compliment to Gettis and Lafell. Being a Hawaii fan myself (My cousin is a volleyball all american on hawaii) I could not help but notice how amzing this guy was. Unbelieveable hands. Always finds a way to get open.

This is the next great slot receiver. Not a burner but a guy who will across the middle and move the chains.

why not just try to get D. Bess from Miami when there is a new CBA if we want a proven WR from Hawaii ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some decent WRs, but they all come with a little risk. The receivers left all have the drop-sies (from what I noticed watching a few of them). Salas, in the bowl game (admittedly, the only Hawaii game I watched) dropped a couple (I believe, could be wrong) that hit him dead in the hands. I'd like us to get another WR, just for competition to drive Lafell and Gettis to improve, but I don't think there is a receiver that could definitely start (unless Smith is traded).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know if we will or won't @ 98. I'm not a GM, so it doesn't matter what I think. I think IF WE TAKE A WR, then we should take a guy like Gates, since he can become a true #1 or #2 WR vs. a slot. I do not have confidence that LaFell will turn into that, so I think we need that. If we needed a slot, then I would go with Salas, but instead would just take someone like Richardo Lockette later.

I hope we take BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • The Mannings were the last two highly drafted qbs to win a SB with the team that drafted them.  Nobody else taken in top 10 won the Super Bowl with their original team. Stafford did it but after a trade.
    • Speaking about Steelers “I would not draft a quarterback for at least two to three years. That's just my opinion. I think as a GM, if I'm GMing this team ... the issue that I see with a lot of teams is they get a quarterback and they try and build around that quarterback. I think it should be the other way around. I think you should build a team and put your quarterback in it. Okay? It happened to me. They had a great football team. They plugged me in. We had a veteran group. It just works. It works better than trying to grab a quarterback and be, okay, we're gonna build around this quarterback, because then it's gonna take you four or five years to build around that quarterback. He's probably gonna look like poo up to it and then you're like, is he really our guy? is he not our guy?"  I agree with him. Only downside  is if you build too good of a roster you’re not drafting high enough to get your  QB
    • I think Bryce running a legit, Cam style RPO would last like maybe two drives before he fumbled it or ran right into a kill shot. 
×
×
  • Create New...