Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina a potential landing spot for Mebane?


KillerKat

Recommended Posts

After failing to reach a long-term deal prior to the lockout, free agent DT Brandon Mebane no longer believes he'll be back in Seattle for the 2011 season.

"I feel like I wasn't in their plans," said Mebane. "And I feel like I have the right to think that because I got a third-round tender. If they really wanted me, they had plenty of time to do what they had to do." Mebane has a good point, and he's likely to draw plenty of interest at the third-round level. Potential landing spots include Denver, Tennessee, Cleveland, Chicago, and Carolina.

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/4367/player?r=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So he had 31 tackles and 1 sack in 2010. Why would we pay big bucks to pick him up when Landri had better numbers than that with 43 tackles and 3 sacks. I would want an upgrade which I am not sure he is. There is a reason Seattle isn't resigning him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather have Cofield, but both should come pretty cheap. If CJ and one of these guys, maybe hardy or the rookie DT can get us 15-20 sacks we will be in good shape. Cofield will eat guys up.These are the best DT prospects other than guys like Haynesworth...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd rather have Cofield, but both should come pretty cheap. If CJ and one of these guys, maybe hardy or the rookie DT can get us 15-20 sacks we will be in good shape. Cofield will eat guys up.These are the best DT prospects other than guys like Haynesworth...?

Cofield, yes Mebane-meh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That’s a nice litt,e argument you have constructed there. I counter with a simple one. Have you watched the way the games were called for Dalton? By two different staffs. 
    • Damn, am I really going to watch Steelers-Bengals on Amazon in a few minutes? Unfortunately, yes, at least for a little bit.
    • That falls entirely into the chicken-and-egg of why is he not attempting those throws more frequently: is it because he can't make those throws, or because he isn't asked to make those throws? If the latter, is he  not being asked to make those throws because the coaching staff doesn't believe he can be successful with them, or because they don't believe those types of throws fit their scheme anyways? We can eliminate option A because he clearly can physically push the ball 40+ yards, successfully or not, or there would be zero attempts of that nature. We have no way of determining which of the two factors are the reason for option B because we don't know what the coaching staff's ultimate assessment of both his abilities and of their own conviction about the value of those throws irregardless of player would be. Again, you will be hard-pressed to find many coaches that will value a play that has an 83% or higher failure rate just to "keep the defense honest" when they have more valuable and consistent options at their disposal. But the core of my argument is that it's not like it's an impossibility for Bryce to push the ball downfield, it's simply that it's not the amazing cure-all that some seem to imagine it to be even for elite QBs.
×
×
  • Create New...