Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So who's going to see Hangover 2 this week?

Dpantherman

By Dpantherman,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted

my friend who just moved up saw it before I caught up with him. Said it was hilarious.

I want to see both, I'm keeping my expectations low on Hangover 2..

Head the same thing about Bridesmaids. Several buddies saw it with their GF's. They were skeptical at first, but said they were laughing so hard that they were crying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthro Community Regular

Panthro

Posted
Posted

Yeah I want to

Wanna see Bridesmaids as well....talked to some girls I was chillin with this wknd who saw it and said they didn't stop laughing the whole time

My gf was supposed to go with her friends last week to see Bridesmaids but was unable to because of BBQ. I took her last night. I enjoyed it more than I thought I would and the last scene had me hunched over laughing. (Which is rare for a movie)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
boo7382 Newbie

boo7382

Posted
Posted

Looks like they will be cutting it close if it releases on time:

Hangover 2' Movie Execs in Court: Possible Injunction

May 24, 2011 01:10 AM EDT

With Hangover 2 set to hit theaters this week, the top executives of Warner Bros. Studio seem to be taking a lawsuit very seriously today. Back in April, S. Victor Whitmill filed suit against the movie and the studio over a tattoo on Ed Helms's face which he claims is a replica of his original work, therefore making them liable for copyright infringement. Whitmill is also looking for an injunction to stop the film from coming out. Can a tattoo be copyrighted? This is not so much a frivolous case as it is an unprecedented one.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, "The studio dispatched two of its top executives to St. Louis on Monday to testify during a four-hour federal court hearing on whether a judge will issue an injunction preventing the planned Thursday rollout of the highly anticipated comedy sequel."

http://entertainment.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474979360026

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The_Cannon Newbie

The_Cannon

Posted
Posted

Clintons not in it. He was in Bangkok (or where ever they shot the film) at the same time they were shooting and visited the set because he was a fan of the first movie but he didn't actually shoot anything. People saw him on the set and just assumed he was in it. Be awesome if he was.

http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/03/07/bill-clinton-no-cameo-hangover-part-2/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...