Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers have the best football name in the NFL.


Recommended Posts

according to me

Charleston -- Carolina Panthers super fan Jasonluckydog announced today that the Carolina Panthers had the best name in all of the NFL and for that matter any sport.

"I'm just your average Panther super fan here and I could care less if no one else agrees with me." Jasonluckydog said today.

Like most other fans of NFL teams some of those idiots will beg to differ, but fug them.

https://twitter.com/#!/jasonluckydog

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is he basing this off of? I think the name Carolina is rather vague. Like is it North Carolina is it South Carolina? I mean I'm a Panthers "superfan" too but I under stand why we can't get respect in this league when we have a geographically ambiguous name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is he basing this off of? I think the name Carolina is rather vague. Like is it North Carolina is it South Carolina? I mean I'm a Panthers "superfan" too but I under stand why we can't get respect in this league when we have a geographically ambiguous name.

The only other states with a north and south are North and South Dakota. North Carolina Panthers and South Carolina Panthers just sound bad imo. Also by combining the two states you are increasing your fan base.

I bet people out side of the Carolinas probably wonder why we are two different states to begin with anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went to school with a girl name Carolina...she was black...Panthers are black. Jerry Richardson named his team the Carolina (black) Panthers(black). Two black cancel each other out and make a white. There fore Jerry Richardson is racist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet people out side of the Carolinas probably wonder why we are two different states to begin with anyways.

BC those SC bitches separated from Carolina in 1729.

I say good riddance. And take your ghey flag with you. Really?!?!? A palm tree and crescent moon? Worst flag in the union.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is he basing this off of? I think the name Carolina is rather vague. Like is it North Carolina is it South Carolina? I mean I'm a Panthers "superfan" too but I under stand why we can't get respect in this league when we have a geographically ambiguous name.

Like the "New England" Patriots?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went to school with a girl name Carolina...she was black...Panthers are black. Jerry Richardson named his team the Carolina (black) Panthers(black). Two black cancel each other out and make a white. There fore Jerry Richardson is racist.

That depends on if you're talking about light or pigment. In light, black is the absence of all color. Whereas with pigment it is all colors combined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...