Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bobcats and Knicks trade rumor ( VERY INTERESTING)


BOBCATS_BALL!

Recommended Posts

http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/06/20/report-knicks-trying-to-trade-up-to-get-jimmer-fredette/

Jimmer Fredette and how he fits in the NBA divides scouts and fans, but there is one thing almost all agree on — he’s a better fit in a wide-open offensive system where he would have more of a green light.

For example, Mike D’Antoni’s system with the New York Knicks.

Which explains why ESPN’s Chad Ford is reporting (behind ESPN’s pay wall) the Knicks are trying to move up in the draft to see if they can get Jimmer.

Sources say that the Charlotte Bobcats (9), Milwaukee Bucks (10) and Golden State Warriors (11) are also open to moving their picks. In this case the interest is all pretty specific. The Knicks, and a handful of other teams, are trying to get ahead of the Jazz. The target? BYU’s Jimmer Fredette.

Interesting, but the Knicks are not exactly loaded with trade assets (those all went to Denver to get Carmelo Anthony, thank you very much James Dolan). Can Landry Fields and the No.17 pick move you up seven spots or so?

Is that worth it to get Jimmer? There is no way Jimmer falls to 17. There are a lot of teams willing to move picks in this draft but not a lot of teams willing to give up quality assets to move up. At least not yet.

Now I know this is just a rumor and unlikey to happen but if we could do a trade like that for the 9th, I would be so happy. Look at what this draft could become with a trade like that.

9. Landry Fields

17. Marshon Brooks

19. Jordan Hamilton

39. Keith Benson

I honestly cant imagine a better scenario but I realize this probably has little chance of happening.

I might even do 9 and 19 for Fields and 17 ( Knicks might have to throw something else in too).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's more likely to happen then one would initially think. Silas and the Cats like this drafts depth rather then individual talents.... (reason why they turned down the move up 2 - 1 swap, but reverse that and give the bobcats a player and let them keep 2 first round picks.... I don't think they turn that down.

NY would do it because he doesn't really fit the team at this point and it would allow them to get a player that should fit into NY's system perfectly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jizzed in my pants

I know, think about how much more talented this team will be if we have Fields at SF and then add two more first round talents. And in this draft the guy you get at 9 and the guy you get at 17 arent too different.

I honestly dont think you cant get a guy as good as Fields at 9 plus we get a first rounder.

I would go wild if this did happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

would be very happy but I highly doubt the Knicks would risk that, they don't really need Fredette and Fields spot up shooting helps out a lot on their squad. They would much rather get a distributing pg who can get the ball to Amare and Melo, as well as run in D'Antoni's offense much like Nash did

In my opinion the Knicks need to get rid of D'Antoni and pull out all stops for Chris Paul. Trading away a piece like Landry Fields for a huge risk like Fredette just doesn't make much sense to me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep, like I said, I don't mind guaranteeing them money, but make the contracts smaller amounts in order to minimize cap implications. I don't know about "half," the actual amounts, whether more or less than half, would have to be determined by the NFL and NFLPA (which will probably be highly contentious, if not "impossible").  I'm just for whatever leads to the best product on the field while also unaffecting my wallet. As an aside, the NFL owners are greedy bastards in my estimation. They're trying to keep a larger portion of the pie, but players' agents are greedy as well, and they've sewn seeds of greed among the players. It's not all their fault; we all know what our society has evolved into, but the NFL wants a bigger piece of our smaller pocketbooks and refuses to "negotiate" with us (that's why we don't have cheaper and more reasonable à la carte options to view games that they're gradually trying to migrate to paid TV), so fu<k 'em. And then on top of that we have guys trying to water down the product even more by feeding greed. Change the way things are done so that we can at least see players prove themselves on the field without throwing wrenches into the engine that pays guys that have proven they can play on a pro level.
    • So if one of the parents wants to buy the theatre group or the band lunch they should get banned?
×
×
  • Create New...