Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Am I a Loser if I..


The Saltman

Recommended Posts

If they had U-verse in my area I would switch in a heartbeat.

Keep on checking. I love it. Gotta be the easiest sales job ever too. Last year when I took my box full of Time Warner garbage to their office to cancel service there were three other people that live on my street doing the same thing.

When they come in, they take over. They go door to door too. I usually hate that but after a few qualifying questions he was most welcome in my home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, I can't trash TWC cable enough.. I have U-Verse now, and about to move in a month, going to set it up there too.

I had TWC for 8 straight years with the same package, 1st tier Digital, 3 HD boxes, 1 reg box, Roadrunner regular, and I don't think I ever had the same bill amount.

They did that whole "lock your rate" thing a couple years back and I changed my package a bit to take the deal, then we get a letter a few months later saying how everyone's rate was going up because they wanted to expand customer service. Guess what. Rate Lock went right out the window.

Everyone I know in Greensboro has already changed over or is checking on U-verse availability every week or so. About every other week when I walk into the pub somebody comes up and tells me they finally got their U-verse and love it. TWC has a terrible name around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...