Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sneaky players had insurance the whole time!


Happy Panther

Recommended Posts

I had heard that this revalation was what accelerated the agreement. the player's premise was that the lockout was hurting the player's irreparably. With the revelation that Smith had secretly gone out and obtained insurance. Something he didn't disclose to the judge when he was claiming how they were wronged and wanting damages for the TV deal the owner's made secretly. Maybe it is me but this seems to be the same situation with the exception that the owner's deal reportedly benefited them to the detriment of the players while insurance doesn't injure the pwner. Still with that kind of money the player's can hardly claim the lockout would damage them at least in the short term. But by all accounts this revelation was the impetus for all the substantial movement in the past day or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm drunk but I'm pretty sure that this was already known and stated by D-Smith very early in the lockout. Actually if I'm not mistaken it was stated that the players would be getting insurance not necessarily that they had it. I just assumed that they got it.

Hmmm that paragraph looks like a conversation with myself haha fug it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm drunk but I'm pretty sure that this was already known and stated by D-Smith very early in the lockout. Actually if I'm not mistaken it was stated that the players would be getting insurance not necessarily that they had it. I just assumed that they got it.

Hmmm that paragraph looks like a conversation with myself haha fug it.

No. That was a different fund that the NFLPA had set aside to pay each player (50,000 I think). This is an insurance policy. Two different funds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean I just don't understand the argument. Baker and Sam both have been pro bowl QBs post their time here. And you just said yourself that is due to him having a damn good roster around him and they are well coached. You're even saying the bad baker is still there somewhere, but he is in a good organization with good roster and coaching that they are getting the best out of him. Why does Baker and Sam get all that benefit of the doubt but when it comes to Bryce it must be a BY9 problem, not an org or team problem?  Hell I got a guy below you arguing with me that Chark/Hurst/Mingo sucked because Bryce wouldn't throw them open. It's ridiculous how far the stretch goes. 
    • Correct.  It’s really hard to get open in the NFL when opposing defenses gameplan and cheat coverage/routes on all your players because they know your QB can’t make certain throws/plays.   magically no one that comes to Carolina can get open or make plays with the ball in their hands…..it’s like there is one singular common dominator to it all.  BY makes playing defense way too easy.   NFL players are too good to allow one side to cheat coverage and not respect all the potential threats of a route  so you can dial up a great play.  But if corners and safeties just cheat coverage and know X and Y happening on route/threats….getting open gets hard when they just play it one way.  Getting open has a lot to do with the different threats a WR can pose on a given play.  
    • Kinda depends how you look at it both were 3rd round draft pics.  Nico was nothing before stroud and tank came in with stroud.  If both were on the panthers would young have them doing well and starting or would their stats be low.  I really dont know the answer to that.  None of the panthers wrs have left and did well either but personally i feel neither of nico or tank would do much on the panthers.  
×
×
  • Create New...