Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

JT to the Pats?


CatMan72

Recommended Posts

http://www.profootballtalk.com/2009/03/04/jason-taylor-to-the-pats/

I point this out because there has been allot of speculation that Peppers would get traded to the Pats, but if they sign JT then that's another dead end for Peppers and his agent.

At this point, the Dolphins look like the most likely destination for Peppers if we decide to trade him. I thought it was interesting that Tom Sorenson from the Charlotte Observer, who was confident a month ago that we had seen Peppers in a Panthers uniform for the last time, said in his QA yesterday that he now thinks Peppers will stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, this is such a fresh idea it needed it's own new thread.

..and yet you took the time to reply - I'm sorry you don't deem this thread worthy, but I'm going to go ahead and start whatever thread I want if that's okay with you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..and yet you took the time to reply - I'm sorry you don't deem this thread worthy, but I'm going to go ahead and start whatever thread I want if that's okay with you?

Cut the hostility there Big Guy. The issue is that there are 1,000 threads on the Peppers situation. Rather than start a new thread, first look to see if there is a thread appropriate for your idea/comment/etc...

No one was questioning your post....only whether another thread was needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill Parcells won't go the Pep route.

I agree with this. I do not think Pep is a Parcells type of player. If it is true Pep didnt like JR asking him to be a leader etc, how do you think Pep will react with Parcells on his ass.

I would like to see it though. Would make it more interesting to see Pep on a Parcells team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...