Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB starter per Lombardi


carolinarolls

Recommended Posts

I get the man crush on Cam. I am excited about him too. But I don't see how it's so easy to dismiss using useless practices with a QB who knows the system to give the rest of the team more time to get a handle on it. There is a reason he was brought in and logic says he is to warm the team up for Cam to take the reigns.

Anyone who looks at this preseason for the Panthers as a clue to who the staff has fingered as QB1 is not looking at this very intelligently.

I disagree, I think preseason will be a huge factor in who the #1 QB week 1. I think ideally Rivera wants Cam to be that guy week 1.....if he ain't ready either DA or Clausen will start the year off based on preseason/practice.

I think DA is a saftey net......not a plan for the start of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree, I think preseason will be a huge factor in who the #1 QB week 1. I think ideally Rivera wants Cam to be that guy week 1.....if he ain't ready either DA or Clausen will start the year off based on preseason/practice.

I think DA is a saftey net......not a plan for the start of the year.

Oh hell no. Not starter for the year. This is about starter in preseason. the thinking is that since he know the offense the best he can get everyone up to speed fastest. And since it's preseason, bad passes can be overlooked as long as everyone else has their assignments down. This creates a much less nightmarish situation for Cam to inherit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No kidding.

Signing Derek Anderson was a nightmare? I'm sorry the ordeal was so difficult for some of you.

Agreed. there was a time when I wanted him to be a Panther so bad. Now he is. A pro bowler who is still young and is the only QB on the roster who knows the offense.

Some posters on here are ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clausen will almost certainly start.

DA hasn't even practiced yet. There is more to team chemistry then knowing the coaches playbook.

Putting Cam in to start puts ALL the pressure on him. That would be in sane. You bring him in against a second string defense and build his confidence. I would be shocked if this didn't happen.

Clausen will get a chance to show what he can do. Chud will want to see what he is really dealing with here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

let me clarify

again

this is for the first preseason game. I got corrected on the date of the game so I am sure somebody else understood that. This is not for the season opener.

WTF does team chemistry have to do with Pre-Season?

Hate to sound like Mark Packer here but Pre-Season means nothing and is practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clausen will almost certainly start.

DA hasn't even practiced yet. There is more to team chemistry then knowing the coaches playbook.

Putting Cam in to start puts ALL the pressure on him. That would be in sane. You bring him in against a second string defense and build his confidence. I would be shocked if this didn't happen.

Clausen will get a chance to show what he can do. Chud will want to see what he is really dealing with here.

DA knows the playbook and has been around the block....I could see him starting just as easily as Clausen. DA knows more......and any QB walking in off the street could have more chemistry with Smitty than Jimmy.

I think Cam gets his first preseason start game 3 pending his first 2 go as planned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

let me clarify

again

this is for the first preseason game. I got corrected on the date of the game so I am sure somebody else understood that. This is not for the season opener.

WTF does team chemistry have to do with Pre-Season?

Hate to sound like Mark Packer here but Pre-Season means nothing and is practice.

makes sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
×
×
  • Create New...