Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

'Always Sunny...', Louie, and Wilfred renewed by FX


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

FX announced renewals today for their comedy series It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia, Louie and Wilfred.

Always Sunny actually got a two-year pickup, meaning they'll be on the air through at least 2013 with Season 9 (Season 7 begins airing this fall). The deal also includes an option for a tenth season. In addition, FX Productions is entering into a three-year exclusive television overall deal with RCG, the production company run by Sunny Creators/Executive Producers/Stars Rob McElhenney, Charlie Day and Glenn Howerton.

Louie was renewed for Season 3 and Wilfred for Season 2, both of which will consist of thirteen episodes.

http://tv.ign.com/articles/118/1186599p1.html

I'm one of the few people that have never seen 'Sunny'. Love Wilfred, and Louie is brilliant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

League and Archer (great shows) were already renewed. The League is back in October, Archer is back in the spring. Louie takes a while but its pretty good love Wilfred, never seen Sunny but I've heard a alot of things.

Anyone else notice that Shiva from the League is the hot shifter chick from this seasons True Blood?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilfred is the one with Frodo, I've seen a few episodes and thought it was pretty good, I need to catch up though.

Always Sunny is still, IMO, the funniest show ever. The last season wasn't that great though, but the previous ones were gold. I'm hoping they can get things going in the right direction with this upcoming season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...