Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lee Evans


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

Sutton can play

No way in hell we let Goodson go for a 30 yr old receiver cause he's more than just a RB

Yeh sutton can play, but do you really think buffalo is willing to give up their best offensive weapon for a guy who has had no real game experience. We have all seen what he can do in camp, and he has looked good, but Buffalo probably won't know that, and wont trade evans for what they would consider to be a gamble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dout they would want sutton or goody seeing as they just drafted spiller. Would be dumb to give up on him after a season.

The NFL is a two or more back league....the days of Barry Sanders, Walter Payton and Emmitt Smith are over....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dout they would want sutton or goody seeing as they just drafted spiller. Would be dumb to give up on him after a season.

Yeh, goodson and spiller are the same player. Sutton makes more sense to compliment spiller but like I said, its unlikely that they will know anything about him.

Edit: NJpanther12 made a good point on twitter, I, like him, will be furious if we give up a 2nd for Lee Evans and not Asante Samuel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From:

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2011/08/09/2514140/big-cat-happy-with-offseason.html#ixzz1UXPuPp8u

If retaining players is a priority, why trade Chicago a third-round pick for tight end Greg Olsen?

Richardson: "Marty said, 'I'm reluctant to bring this (acquiring Olsen) up because we talked about keeping our own players.' I said, 'Marty we'd be crazy not to do this. We (can) take a 26-year-old tight end we coveted coming out of the draft.' "

Doesn't sound like a guy who's ready to trade another 2nd or 3rd rounder (especially a 3rd that we don't have).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last 2 years Smitty put up better #s then Evans, Smitty and Evans are not even close in talent. I do see your point.

you're right, Smitty is a legit #1 receiver. I see Evans as a great #2 option, which is exactly what we need. I wouldn't look too deeply into Evan's numbers the past 2 seasons. He's playing for the giant butthole that is known as the Buffalo Bills, afterall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chad Johnson got traded for a 5th and 6th.

Why would we give up a 2nd?

And dont give me Armanti crap, that was to draft a player, not for someone outside the organization.

I am not saying we definitely wont trade for him, but I promise it wont be for a second, anyone who would even speculate that is a fugin dumbass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...