Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Ratings for Madden 12


ThePantherDude

Recommended Posts

My take:

CJ - about 5 or 7 points too low

Kalil - about 5 points too low

Deangelo - about 4 points too low, but I guess it's understandable

Stewart - about 9 points too low

Otah - about 5 points too high (if Deangelo got penalized so much for missing half the season, Otah should get penalized more for missing all of the season..)

Gross - 2 points too high

Pike - about 14 points too high

Overall though, I'd say it's about as fair a shake as we've gotten in Madden in a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My take:

CJ - about 5 or 7 points too low

Kalil - about 5 points too low

Deangelo - about 4 points too low, but I guess it's understandable

Stewart - about 9 points too low

Otah - about 5 points too high (if Deangelo got penalized so much for missing half the season, Otah should get penalized more for missing all of the season..)

Gross - 2 points too high

Pike - about 14 points too high

Overall though, I'd say it's about as fair a shake as we've gotten in Madden in a long time.

Clausen 40 points too high

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what made you decide to create another pointless thread when you could have posted this info in the other one you saw? Im just sayin.....

plus I really think its more of a Nerdvana thread. That's where all the other video games are discussed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Malcom Spence is the best player remaining, hope he’s there.
    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
×
×
  • Create New...