Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Newton starter vs Bengals, Week 1 starter TBD


Sword

Recommended Posts

Never said he was anything other than "pretty good"

So incompletions don't count when evaluating QB play? You think when they watch the film the next day they will say "Incomplete pass, no need looking at it..."

This is also new to me.

So cam not throwing a pick or turnover is worse than moore's fumble that lead to a score? Moore played no worse or better than cam against lesser comp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they did and TRD said that over and over, but it was the metric chosen by the other dude so w/e.

imo Moore was the second best quarterback in that game, and I don't think it was close.

okay.....but it is still a flawed bet. One I never discussed nor care to.

As far as Moore being the 2nd best...probably but it is still a flawed scenario.

Look at Henne vs. Cam and leave Moore out of it.

Henne was throwing to probably one of the top 3 WRs in the league vs. scrub corners.

Cam was throwing against garbage WRs against the Phins starting CBs.....

I mean you can compare them as starting QBs......but the field is setup to make it a completely bogus comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, incompletions do count when just evaluting QB play.....

but so do turnovers and they have much more influence.

You know, kinda like you acknowledged Cam's dropped throws or good throws broken up and quickly dismissed them last week.

So in purely evaluating QB play, a perfectly thrown TD pass that was dropped weighs more than a sack fumble on a play that you know nothing about?

Just trying to establish a baseline here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but we did.

and we are going to use him on roll outs...

I know and I'm sad

Just because we are going to use him in roll outs doesn't mean its the right thing to do...if the coaches are going to play to this kids strengths then having him roll out to pass the ball should not be in the playbook...at least not until he gets his mechanics under control.

Anyone that has watched him objectively will know this. Kid is not accurate enough standing in a pocket to hit all the throws...why have him try it on the run?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So cam not throwing a pick or turnover is worse than moore's fumble that lead to a score? Moore played no worse or better than cam against lesser comp.

How many failed third down or stalled drives = one turnover?

Moore also gave his team a chance at a TD, Cam barely crossed the 50

Lots of things to consider...

Only the true Cam apologists think it's even close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In your opinion, who played better? Considering everything?

out of who?

Moore and Cam?

They weren't comparable scenarios to even talk about......you can't compare a guy going against a top tier D unit in the NFL most likely.....to a guy going against backups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as Moore being the 2nd best...probably but it is still a flawed scenario.

it is, I agree. everything about comparing two players in the preseason is flawed, but we're fans, and we like to do stupid poo because we're bored.

cam will get better, friday wasn't his best day but it won't be his last.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many failed third down or stalled drives = one turnover?

Moore also gave his team a chance at a TD, Cam barely crossed the 50Lots of things to consider...

Only the true Cam apologists think it's even close.

Last time I checked Carolina was a team built to run.....

and they didn't attempt to actually run the ball w/ Cam in.....

So the offense not moving that smoothly should be no surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in purely evaluating QB play, a perfectly thrown TD pass that was dropped weighs more than a sack fumble on a play that you know nothing about?

Just trying to establish a baseline here.

Aren't you doing a 180 from last week? You didn't give credit for Cam throwing good passes at Lafell in the end zone or the drops by Edwards and Clowny. Now you want to bring up drops?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can evaluate them on what you saw, unless you don't think you are knowledgeable to to take everything into consideration and evaluate their play.

I don't know things like who was open down field etc... I have no access to the routes the receivers were running down field because very few camera angles gave us access to that.

based on what I DID see, it looked like Moore played very well, and Jimmy and Cam not as well.

But it's still a bit flawed... fun to discuss, but hard to really say too much about it.

Last time I checked Carolina was a team built to run.....

and they didn't attempt to actually run the ball w/ Cam in.....

So the offense not moving that smoothly should be no surprise.

they did run the ball with cam early... but when your quarterback isn't completing passes and the couple run plays you had don't go anywhere, you end up in 3rd and longs. Then you end up down, and once you're down...

they did run on the first couple drives and the offense still was ineffective, so I don't think that was really what was up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...