Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We have a mod position open...


Zod

Recommended Posts

To be a moderator is a challenging task believe it or not. Being able to tell the difference from trolling and an opinion is a must. Also being mindful of what you post makes a good moderator. When others see that you've broken the rules they feel like if he can do it so can i and that makes others feel as thoa they can do whatever they want now.

I'm humble to say that i could be one but i'm honest enough to say ive been a buthead from time to time. Two people that i think should be considered are catman and Mr Scot although i think they've been considered in the past.

See below.

In all seriousness, I think Mr. Scot (although he's not interested), DP, Jase, Bleys, and P55 are all reasonable candidates if my awesomeness doesn't win out.

Correct.

Question: are there any people here that moderated on the old panthers.com forum.

Yeah. Me. And that experience is a big reason why I don't want that particular job again.

Brad Thomas was a mod there too. Also a fella named Markimus Prime (great guy, posts on Pantherfanz now) along with another guy whose name escapes me. And Of course, our good buddy Meat was the Admin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His was so small that it really wasnt a big thing.

That's what sh...Wait :mad:

I accept the position.

That's really not a statement you want to make in regard to any "interview process" in this forum :eek:

no homo, just brothers from another mother.

I call DP my adopted son on this forum. I'm honestly not sure what that makes you :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the best candidates could be folks that are here often but rarely post. those of you that post 30 times a day (nothing wrong with that) have gotten into so many pissing matches that i have doubts in your ability to be an objective moderator.

i also think it would be wise to create "moderator" accounts. make the process of moderating anonymous and let zod determine if moderators are doing their job effectively and objectively.

that's my two pennies.

That's how they did it on the official Panthers forum.

If you want to become a mod you gotta realize that your not just chatting with an avatar your chatting with an actual person behind a computer screen. People tend to forget that sometimes IMO.

Sound advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...