Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

McDermott's Defense


Ruff

Recommended Posts

... Is going to be good.

Starting two rookie DTs, All-Pro MLB goes out of the game, playing with a career nickle as your #2 CB against a pass-happy offense, and five weeks to teach this groups the defensive scheme.

I like the way the new defense is heading, and I think that I'm eventually going to love this defense.

:cam:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gotta admit.. those rookie DTs did much better than I thought they would

however, our defense let 2 receivers (King and Doucet) run down field completely uncovered, that turned into 14 points.. if they can fix that kind of stuff then we are in business

Doucet's TD was a blown tackle and the same with the kick return. Can't blame coaches or schemes for that unless mis-tackles become a common occurance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok i saw everyone bashing mcdermott but we got no clue who busted the coverage. this is a new system like the op pointed out. when we dont blitz ppl complain...when we do ppl complain. two tds were blown coverage. mcdermott wasnt on the field playing. one td was a punt return. so our defense thatwe believed was going to get steamrolled only gave up 21.

"Its a jump to conclusions mat. You see there's this mat with different conclusions you can jump to!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whoa whoa whoa.

Captain played well today. Gamble played extraordinary. Godfrey was solid, but had some busted plays.

Sherrod Martin, the lone man in the who escaped huddle criticism this offseason? He was teh suk.

We HAVE to get better up front. These persistent jailbreak blitzes on 3rd and long are terrible-they DID work a few times, but they also cost us 14 points, we must be able to generate more pressure from the front 4. That said, the front 4 played the run very well after the first quarter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, no I’m not going to panic when he got 2 Qs and looked great in 1 and looked not great in another (let’s not mention the drop).    Yeah we finally have a team that would be considered average offensively around him. Let’s roll this season. 
    • The woe is me everything but Bryce sucks mantra is stale af my friend. Look nobody here is going to argue with the fact Frank Reich was not a good head coach. At the same time. Bryce Young is now in his second season with his second coaching staff and a handpicked young offensive head coach who has been known for working with QB's such as Baker and Geno. As far as the offensive pieces around Bryce we have the 4th highest salary cap allocation (that might be even higher now after the new Moton deal) dedicated to the OL in the entire league. We have 2 first round WR's one of them 8th overall the first time we've ever selected a WR that high in franchise history. And the fact of the matter is Bryce Young did not have a good preseason. It's not the first time it's happened either. We all hope to see he and the rest of the team flip a switch in week 1. But we should all be able to agree that the offensive performances we've seen from the entire QB room (Bryce included) in preseason was simply unacceptable.
    • We have seen Bryce play… what… 9 games with AT BEST what one would consider NFL average WRs? You just can’t see the forest for the trees and keep going back to your lazy take of revisionist history.    he looked AWFUL Y1 with the worst coaching I’ve ever seen in the NFL and one of the weakest WR rooms I can recall. He looked awful first half of y2 and great second half of y2 with average coaching and average skill position. I don’t know where this elite talent argument even comes from. 
×
×
  • Create New...