Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some constructive criticism on Cam Newton's performance. Please don't shoot.


PantherFanForLife

Recommended Posts

Not taking anything away from his amazing performance, but I also think we shouldn't forget he's a rookie who has a lot to learn. They're going to talk about it in the film room so we might as well talk about it too. His tendency to throw to his first read and not look for second options does seem to be there at times, and I noticed it again while voting for rookie of the week on the last play of the game. It's at minute 2:30 of the Cam's Newton full highlight video.

http://www.nfl.com/voting/rookies

Had he just been a bit more aware, #17 Legedu Naanee was open for an easy TD and was 2 steps ahead of the same receiver he passed to, but with no one on him, almost the entire route. Before you tell me he was getting blitzed and had to release the ball quickly, notice that Naanee was actually open prior to Goodson, so he could have released it even quicker.

Now I personally don't believe this is a "QB issue", or a permanent flaw, but rather something that just needs to be learned and takes care of itself as he gains more experience. But I do believe this IS something they will be working on as the season unfolds and could affect his game.

One of two things will happen. He could smoothly transition to becoming more patient and adjusting his game to check his #2, #3, etc receivers without disrupting his game too much. But one also has to take into consideration that one of his strongest points in the game against Arizona and as a QB, his ability to quickly release the ball, is probably based a lot on him going to that first read. Considering our O-line isn't very giving, and him needing more time in order to start reading the field, I can see some growing pains in this area as he begins to branch out.

I believe the only way he won't have issues here, is if the O-line improves at the same time as him learning to do this. It will go hand in hand. And this isn't an "IF" situation. He will be learning how to read his other options, and it will be this season, since if he continues to play like that for 16 games it will only be a matter of time before opponent's D's will capitalize on this.

Am I being too picky or do you think this is a valid concern?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not taking anything away from his amazing performance, but I also think we shouldn't forget he's a rookie who has a lot to learn. They're going to talk about it in the film room so we might as well talk about it too. His tendency to throw to his first read and not look for second options does seem to be there at times, and I noticed it again while voting for rookie of the week on the last play of the game. It's at minute 2:30 of the Cam's Newton full highlight video.

http://www.nfl.com/voting/rookies

Had he just been a bit more aware, #17 Legedu Naanee was open for an easy TD and was 2 steps ahead of the same receiver he passed to, but with no one on him, almost the entire route. Before you tell me he was getting blitzed and had to release the ball quickly, notice that Naanee was actually open prior to Goodson, so he could have released it even quicker.

Now I personally don't believe this is a "QB issue", or a permanent flaw, but rather something that just needs to be learned and takes care of itself as he gains more experience. But I do believe this IS something they will be working on as the season unfolds and could affect his game.

One of two things will happen. He could smoothly transition to becoming more patient and adjusting his game to check his #2, #3, etc receivers without disrupting his game too much. But one also has to take into consideration that one of his strongest points in the game against Arizona and as a QB, his ability to quickly release the ball, is probably based a lot on him going to that first read. Considering our O-line isn't very giving, and him needing more time in order to start reading the field, I can see some growing pains in this area as he begins to branch out.

I believe the only way he won't have issues here, is if the O-line improves at the same time as him learning to do this. It will go hand in hand. And this isn't an "IF" situation. He will be learning how to read his other options, and it will be this season, since if he continues to play like that for 16 games it will only be a matter of time before opponent's D's will capitalize on this.

Am I being too picky or do you think this is a valid concern?

On your play in question I believe that Newton just trusted his receiver to have gotten beyond the 1st down marker. In a post game quote Goodson stated that he thought he was beyond the marker but apparently he had come up just short. So Newton saw a read that he could make and assumed it was a 1st down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually the thing i liked the most about cam was his field vision. dude's eyes constantly roved the field. he wasn't just checking his first read and running; he made his first, second, third, etc. and spread the ball out VERY well.

he flat out missed naane, but i'm willing to bet by week 17 he makes that throw and TD every time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On your play in question I believe that Newton just trusted his receiver to have gotten beyond the 1st down marker. In a post game quote Goodson stated that he thought he was beyond the marker but apparently he had come up just short. So Newton saw a read that he could make and assumed it was a 1st down.

Even so, Goodson looked like a harder, more covered and slower target to hit than #17. Naanee was already full sprint, and lost his man, before Goodson could get open. If he hit 17 that would have been a TD.

And yes I know even vets miss miss open receivers, but the only reason this bothered me is because they were both 3 feet away from each other, right in front of him, and his vision was not obstructed. One was open and one was not. That's what makes me believe he had already decided to go with Goodson, no matter what, prior to the snap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even so, Goodson looked like a harder, more covered and slower target to hit than #17. Naanee was already full sprint, and lost his man, before Goodson could get open. If he hit 17 that would have been a TD.

And yes I know even vets miss miss open receivers, but the only reason this bothered me is because they were both 3 feet away from each other, right in front of him, and his vision was not obstructed. One was open and one was not. That's what makes me believe he had already decided to go with Goodson, no matter what, prior to the snap.

Goodson was the primary read on the throw, that was quoted as well. It was 4th and 5, decisive play of the game and it was Goodson's responsibility to get enough yardage for the 1st. Cam saw his primary read 1st and knew he could make the throw, I really don't have a problem with the play from a Cam standpoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

watch the rest of the game again and hen say he only looks at his first option.

every QB will have moments in game where they make the wrong choice and miss an open guy....esp. in situations like that.

he does need to get better in making decisions, but that will come with experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Harkening back to debates we had in the Delhomme years, people need to better understand how QB reads work.

You don't look through every single read and then make a choice. As often as not, there wouldn't be time for that anyway.

You look at your first read. He's open? You throw it to him. He's not? You move to the next one.

On plays where the primary read is Steve Smith, you can expect fairly often that it's going to go to him.

This is one reason why people had the perception that Delhomme only threw to Smith. Reality was that was what the play design dictated.

With there already having been questions about Newton making reads, it won't surprise me if this conception rears it's head again.

But it shouldn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goodson was the primary read on the throw, that was quoted as well. It was 4th and 5, decisive play of the game and it was Goodson's responsibility to get enough yardage for the 1st. Cam saw his primary read 1st and knew he could make the throw, I really don't have a problem with the play from a Cam standpoint.

Then it is a valid concern cause that's what it looked like to me too. That's gonna happen though, meaning a receiver not doing what he's supposed to do, and when it does, you as a QB need to go to other options. Things like this happen on just about every down.

Again, I didn't think this happened consistently throughout the game, just at times. It just looked obvious on that play and it sucked that it happened on that crucial down. Maybe it was the pressure at the end there which made him have tunnel vision only for Goodson.

And Mr. Scot, I understand that and I re-iterate: the biggest issue here, is that they were both directly in his line of sight, with Naanee actually being open before Goodson while crossing over Goodson's route. Did you watch the video? He clearly didn't have enough time to check all his reads, and that's not what I'm saying he should have done here. I agree with you there. But you had an open guy, in man to man coverage, crossing directly front of your throwing lane and across the route of your "go to" guy. This was more of a matter of seeing what's already right in front of you and just mentally picking A or B. No head movement required in this case.

Hey this could be a good thing for him. Seeing that on film will no doubt make him pay attention next time.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then it is a valid concern cause that's what it looked like to me too. That's gonna happen though, meaning a receiver not doing what he's supposed to do, and when it does, you as a QB need to go to other options. Things like this happen on just about every down.

Again, I didn't think this happened consistently throughout the game, just at times. It just looked obvious on that play and it sucked that it happened on that crucial down. Maybe it was the pressure at the end there which made him have tunnel vision only for Goodson.

And Mr. Scot, I understand that and I re-iterate: the biggest issue here, is that they were both directly in his line of sight, with Naanee actually being open before Goodson while crossing over Goodson's route. Did you watch the video? He clearly didn't have enough time to check all his reads, and that's not what I'm saying he should have done here. I agree with you there. But you had an open guy, in man to man coverage, crossing directly front of your throwing lane and across the route of your "go to" guy. This was more of a matter of seeing what's already right in front of you and just mentally picking A or B. No head movement required in this case.

Hey this could be a good thing for him. Seeing that on film will no doubt make him pay attention next time.

.

It's still Goodson's responsibility to get past the marker, it's next to impossible for Cam to know if he was before he threw it, do you honestly think that he had time to glance down at the yard markers and fuging count them? It wasn't Cam's fault at all. Goodson is the main read, he can make the throw so he makes it. You don't pass on that because if you do there's no guarantee that you have another open throw and then you've lost the opportunity. You don't pass on an open target that's your main read if you can make the throw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw him make several reads during the game. Like Mr. Scot pointed out. If your first read is open, throw it. I believe the Goodson play was just a safe play. And if he wouldve gotten past the 1st down marker like he was supposed to we would've had a fresh set of downs on the 1 yard line. Also allowing us to burn out the clock.

On a side note, it's refreshing watching Cam step into the pocket to make throws. Not bailing at the first sign of pressure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goodson was the primary read on the throw, that was quoted as well. It was 4th and 5, decisive play of the game and it was Goodson's responsibility to get enough yardage for the 1st. Cam saw his primary read 1st and knew he could make the throw, I really don't have a problem with the play from a Cam standpoint.
a lot of this has to do with newton being a rookie or a green QB. until they have more experience and the coaching staff has more faith in them, their job is to do what the OC tells them to do. OC tells him that if he can get it to goodson, get it to him. it was goodson's job to get the first down.

it's going to take a couple years before the coaching staff will allow him the freedom to make the call, esp. in situations like that. his job is to do what the coaching staff tells him to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not one single pick that is asking me why we drafted a guy in the first place. It was a guy we needed and/or a guy that had certain traits making them stand out. Best of all, I feel everyone we drafted are capable of stepping onto the field this year and have a meaningful role (even Kuwatch on special teams). Obviously, nothing is guaranteed but I'm not seeing any huge flags on guys because they're risky projects or massive overreaches.
    • Here is how Morgan is strategic-He re-signs Scott because he was not going S in round 1--he had the chance, and he did not.  He saw the top of the draft at T and knew none of them would be ready to start day 1, so he signs a veteran to a one-year deal, giving his tackle selection a chance to learn and prepare for what might be LT or RT.  Those two moves suggested, perhaps ironically because they contradict each other, what he was going to do, based on the talent pool.  He never brought in a Robinson replacement at DE/NT, and then moves up to draft one.   I almost wonder if the intent was to draft DT/DE all along at some point, maybe with a trade back, but then Freeling dropped to them.   Of course, we felt that they were looking WR, and wonder if the plan was to draft a WR in round 2 if you traded back in round 1.  However, when Freeling was there, the trade back fell apart.  Then we traded up for Hunter.  We could stick with XL and hope Metchie steps up, so we sat still in round three and took Brazell II, a 1000 yard speedster and perfect Z WR.  What a break. At that time, CB and Center were our biggest needs, and with several possible centers on the board and a good fit for our defense at CB, we grabbed Will Lee III.  Lee and Thornton have people in front of them, but I think Morgan knew we needed a guy who can play the outside and press--and probably step in as Jackson's replacement in 2027.    After making trades to get back into the fifth round, where we grabbed one of the best centers in the draft.  This is significant because we signed Fortner to a one-year deal; maybe Morgan saw what some of us saw--the center position is strong in this draft--on day 3, and day 3 players need a year, in most cases.  Moments later, a safety they had been talking to whose skill set matched what we are looking for in a FS.  As stated, Scott was signed,  but the fact that the Panthers were talking to Wheatley and not Theiemann means that they might have known they were not going FS early, but would need a developmental FS later--which explains why we signed Scott.  So if you pay attention to the one-year, vet deals, you can tell where we planned to sign later-round, developmental players.  What positions did we draft early that did not have 1-year veterans signed in front of them:  DL (Hunter) and WR (I don't count Metchie because I count starting-level players). I would not be surprised to learn later that the plan was DT and WR in rounds 1 and 2--then Freeling fell.  Notice that Freeling--from Mt Pleasant SC, did not come in for a visit.  Most of the other OT candidates had short arms or were certain to be gone. I don't think Freeling was in their plans.  I think a trade back and Hunter and maybe Boston was the vision.  I am guessing that CB was also high on their list.   So in this draft, we got 
    • This is one area I think that is not getting enough exposure in the midst of all the optimism. I like Chuba a great deal from a personal standpoint but he has largely proven nothing on a consistent basis yet. He's had the one season of production but before that most people pegged us as moving on. And last year injuries or not he just did not have that juice. The rest of the guys are completely unproven. I don't see anyone among the group having a game or a handful of games worth of high level production the way Rico Dowdle did last year. And yeah he dropped off and yeah he got an attitude about our incompetent handling of the touches which was honestly justified on his part and he moved on but he did legitimately save our season. That's what it is going to take to seize control of the NFC South. We all know that we will not be passing all over defenses. It is what it is. So who amongst this RB group is capable of doing that? And if we are struggling to run the ball AND pass are we going to revert to making excuses for our coach and QB again? That is definitely getting old.
×
×
  • Create New...