Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Godfrey out w/ concussion?


CRA

Recommended Posts

Yeah I thought the whole not being able to play next Sunday after a concussion rule is mandatory now. Is there an exception to the rule?

He's out.

It's mandatory to pass tests, not to sit out. They're expecting Vick to play next week, for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I thought the whole not being able to play next Sunday after a concussion rule is mandatory now. Is there an exception to the rule?

He's out.

Philly told Schefter that Mike Vick should pass his test and start this Sunday.

The rule is just you pass your test w/ an independent party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank god its a rookie qb and thank god its the jags

MJD is running good. You know they are licking there chops to let him loose on a D that possibly just lost Beason, Davis, and now Godfrey.......

you can avoid Charles Johnson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Rivera is not ready to give up on Pugh, then i am not.

I remember there were times when Godfrey was abused during his first couple of starts. So there is hope, and if Rivera believes he is up to the job then I think he can do it.

But, I'll admit he had been pretty awful so fa.

He has an avg. of 2.0 long TD passes given up each game. All 4 directly fall on him. if he didn't give those up, we could be 2-0.

He's too much of a liability in my eyes. Could cost us another game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...