Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looks like there's bad blood between Rivera and Lovie Smith


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

http://blogs.charlotte.com/panthers/2011/09/lovie-smith-decision-to-let-rivera-go-was-not-personal.html

Rivera was not Smith's first choice as defensive coordinator when he arrived in Chicago in 2004. Smith wanted to hire Rod Marinelli, but Tampa Bay would not let him out of his contract.

So the Bears front office encouraged Smith to bring in Rivera, who played his entire nine-year career with the organization. Rivera was the coordinator for three years, including in 2006 when the Bears went to the Super Bowl.

But Smith chose not to renew Rivera's contract after the Super Bowl season. Instead, he promoted Bob Babich, and Rivera was hired as a linebackers coach in San Diego.

When a reporter asked Smith about not retaining Rivera, Smith said: “I'll tell you, we're really living in the past today.”

“Ron Rivera did a great job for us when he was here,” Smith added. “Each year, you as a head coach decide on what direction you're going forward. That's what I decided. I went in a different direction there.

“No more than that – nothing personal. I wasn't disappointed in the job he did here. It's worked out for both of us.”

Lovie Smith's remarks on Greg Olsen are at the link too and it reads like he took a shot at Olsen too by saying he's just a pass-catching tight end.

With as often as we trade with Chicago and as often as our players go there and vice versa, it seems like there's bad blood between lots of people on both teams, both players and coaches. Should be fun on Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*yawn*

I don't read bad blood anywhere in anything Lovie said about Chico or Olsen.

*shrug*

No bad blood between Lovie and Olsen, just said Olsen sucked. Olsen said in one of his first interviews when he got here that he was pretty displeased with the Bears organization with how it went down.

And I sure got some bad blood subtext from what he said about Rivera though. Whenever someone refuses to talk about why someone was let go and they use the "went in another direction" line, there's usually something there below the surface that they don't want to discuss publicly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was scared Rivera might get promoted to head coach.

Thanks for releasing him though. :D

That make sense. Rivera in Chicago with a the 85 Bear ties, and consecutive seasons w/ a top notch D as the DC for the Bears??

Who would want that temptation for the front office. Probably a smart move by Lovie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...