Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some background on the Jim Johnson 4-3

Tutto

By Tutto,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

chubs2496 Newbie

chubs2496

Posted
Posted

So bc u have been on this forum longer makes everyone else a rookie. That's makes little to no sense. So what y'all are saying is that bc u discuss topics and argue about what u think and your thoughts on this team makes u a veteran bc u have been here longer than him or me. Maybe that guy is the next bill bellicheck. Maybe he's the smartest gameplaner u have ever seen. U don't know. And for someone to say that u know more or that we're rookies is ignorant. If that's the case I have bigger nuts and they are old veterans and wrinkly.

Idk what I'm even arguing now

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TruCatzFan Newbie

TruCatzFan

Posted
Posted

So bc u have been on this forum longer makes everyone else a rookie. That's makes little to no sense. So what y'all are saying is that bc u discuss topics and argue about what u think and your thoughts on this team makes u a veteran bc u have been here longer than him or me. Maybe that guy is the next bill bellicheck. Maybe he's the smartest gameplaner u have ever seen. U don't know. And for someone to say that u know more or that we're rookies is ignorant. If that's the case I have bigger nuts and they are old veterans and wrinkly.

Idk what I'm even arguing now

U are totally over reacting here bro... Read what I posted. It was a good link that he posted, but he himself said that he doesn't understand football (well the x's and o's of football)

I don't think I'm better than anybody because I've been here longer or swag or pi. I just enjoy talking about football. That's all.

So tone it down a lil bit...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chubs2496 Newbie

chubs2496

Posted
Posted

U are totally over reacting here bro... Read what I posted. It was a good link that he posted, but he himself said that he doesn't understand football (well the x's and o's of football)

I don't think I'm better than anybody because I've been here longer or swag or pi. I just enjoy talking about football. That's all.

So tone it down a lil bit...

I'm not overreacting. Im chill. It wasn't even aimed towards u. I was just saying just bc people been on this forum longer dosent mean they are football gods compared to us newbies. And I agree bro I like talking football and discussing it and I don't think I'm better than anyone. It just seems like everyone try's go one up on somebody or show someone up by displaying their genius football knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

Personally I like it when people come on here and want to talk Xs and Os. Everyone starts somewhere so there is no problem if they don't know a lot to begin with. Frankly I like folks who come on here and admit they are no experts versus the ones who think or act they are but know very little.

May be it is me but I like Xs and Os discussions on a football forum a lot more than the typical GIF bomb threads that seem so prevalent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

I'm not overreacting. Im chill. It wasn't even aimed towards u. I was just saying just bc people been on this forum longer dosent mean they are football gods compared to us newbies. And I agree bro I like talking football and discussing it and I don't think I'm better than anyone. It just seems like everyone try's go one up on somebody or show someone up by displaying their genius football knowledge.
the bolded is an overreaction.

no one is saying that.

the OP stated this...

I dont know a ton about Xs and Os, but I do enjoy trying to figure it out.
that implies being a newb more than his join date.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

back on topic....i remember reading this a while back and thought it was a great introductory to the jim johnson defense.

one thing i saw that was spot on and that i love about it is this...

His defense is a zone-blitz style scheme that attempts to create the same kinds of mismatches that the LeBeau 3-4 tries to create.
given a couple relatively injury free years in the system with a solid commitment to it, this defense could be just as solid and respectable/feared.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PanthersATL
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By PanthersATL · Posted

      They said there wasn't clear evidence to warrant the overturn.  How would it have made a difference at that point in the game?   https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/nfl-privately-admitted-to-erroneous-reversal-of-catch-by-panthers
    • Khyber53
      WWE pay per view and programming thread

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Me, I'm sick of WWE channel hopping their PLEs and shows. Netflix now with Raw. USA still has Smackdown but you can't get it with Roku if you don't also have cable. Then they went from all the PLEs on Peacock to ESPN+ which required upgrading your Disney+ package. Then they frikkin' move Saturday Night Main Event with John Cena's retirement match back over to frikkin' Peacock, which we'd just cancelled two months prior because no PLEs there anymore. And there are fewer, but longer matches and its the same danged stories again and again. Rematch after rematch after rematch between PLEs. Fewer matches, fewer wrestlers, more promos (of lesser quality) and less action.  It just seems like it's all fillers and re-runs. I'm tired of Cody Rhodes. I'm tired of Jey Uso. I'm tired of the two Brons. Shuffle the deck a bit guys, this game's getting stale.
    • CPantherKing
      Going for it instead of leading by two scores in the 4th

      By CPantherKing · Posted

      Chuba was 3 yards behind the 3 gap. He was lined up weak offset I. It was a 33 dive. Chuba needed to power through off of Ekwonu's block and slip off into the 5 gap where the Tremble had the lane sealed and Rick pulled the LB out of the 5 gap. Here's a visual if you need proof. Chuba did a jump cut laterally to the 2 gap on the right side with unblocked defenders crashing down and went airborne.   This is a 33 dive that should have been slipped off the block into the 5 gap. Chuba lacked vision, but you can see Rico and Bryce staring at the intended running lane sealed off by Tremble and Ekwonu. He should have read Ekwonu's block. The blocking and misdirection is NOT set up for the right side. The play worked. Chuba failed to execute on this play. Trust who you want to, but I wouldn't suggest you argue with the video. Anyone telling you this was drawn up to go right with the blocking did not analyze it. They are correct it should have been a called dive, and it was a called dive.  This was a weak offset I bringing Tremble in motion from the right to the left.
×
×
  • Create New...