Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Likely landing spots for Cutler


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Peter King has some speculation on likely landing spots for Jay Cutler.

Bucs, Jets make most sense for Cutler

The Panthers are mentioned, but considered as unlikely. We have no first round pick, and word is that the Broncos will want at least that in return. And no, Julius Peppers isn't a suitable alternative, nor is Delhomme. McDaniels will want a 'franchise' type guy. Fans can fantasize all they want to, but realistically the Panthers are not in the mix (nor is it universally agreed that they should be). What's continually forgotten in this discussion is that the trade has to make good sense for the Broncos too.

Don Banks also has a good piece on it: All Cutler, all the time

No mention of the Panthers, but he points out that fanbases all over (including the Cowboys, Texans and Eagles, among others) are indulging in the same kind of "do anything to get him" scenarios as Panther fans.

My personal guess: He ends up with the Bucs. After which anytime he makes a statement to the press, the same folks who defended his character here will post "wow, he really is a whiny prick after all" :rolleyes:

The reasoning for the Bucs? They're already on record as having offered their first rounder and more (some Redskin-esque trading there given that they've already traded away their second) plus they have something of an inside connection.

New Bucs DC Jim Bates is the father or Cutler's former QB coach Jeremy Bates, the firing of whom prompted Cutler's initial trade request. Family connections have been known to play a part in more than one NFL transaction. Don't be surprised if that happens here too.

The Browns have also been heavily speculated, as have the Jets, who would kind of surprise me in one sense. The last time they took on a Bus Cook represented QB with attitude issues, it didn't end all that well. Still, they have a need and have things they can offer in return, so it's possible. The Lions, Titans and 49ers are also possibilities, especially since the 49ers could send over Alex Smith, someone head coach Josh McDaniels might believe he can rebuild (ditto Vince Young and Tennessee).

In the end though, like others, I expect to see him in Tampa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I expect him in Tampa, I don't think he's a good fit there. That really depends on the offense they use though, if they go pass heavy then he's a good fit, if not then no. He has bad numbers on third downs and in the redzone. So his best two downs would be gone on a run team. He needs to go to a team that's going to throw more then they run or will throw on first and 2 downs more times then not. Of all the teams that might go after him, I think his best fit would be with Cleavland, Offensive scheme wise. He would have the most Success with Cleavland's Offense's style. (will be similar to the jets last year.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New York Daily News reports that Jets GM Mike Tannenbaum has officially told the Broncos that he's interested in trading for Cutler. And the Bucs are obviously interested since they tried already.

That makes two teams that have officially expressed interest. Anything else is speculative at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...