Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

THE stat of the game.


pstall

Recommended Posts

THE stat of the game is 30-27.

they scored too much. we didn't score enough. everything else is just excuses.

we could have won. we didn't.

ToP. 3rd down conversions. drops. none of it kept us from winning because we almost won with those number being the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hidden

thats where defense comes in, to try and get 3rd and longs instead of 3rd and shorts

they had quite a few 3rd and longs that they converted.. defense isn't going to put them in 3rd and long every time.. of those they did, they completed at least 4 (IIRC) at very important points of the game.. (a la late 4th quarter)

Link to comment

THE stat of the game is 30-27.

they scored too much. we didn't score enough. everything else is just excuses.

we could have won. we didn't.

ToP. 3rd down conversions. drops. none of it kept us from winning because we almost won with those number being the same.

wait, you mean games are decided by the final score and not stats? well good God almighty King Kong. Where have I been?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hope you understand that this Anti Bryce thing as you call it is really a pro Panthers thing. I think I can safely use we. We want the best for the Panthers.  As far as this other post saying ‘Anti’ Bryce people do misinformation.. you mean like going all in on “Renfro should have caught” that poorly thrown ball? I guess it was week 1. And calling it a drop. Comical btw.  I wonder, did you call that out or let it slide because it aligned with your agenda? 
    • These are great posts with the comparisons and the numbers.   I haven’t lookyat Smity’s numbers since probably the first time he was on the ballot.  But if you watched every week you know what he is. Whatever his yardage or targets numbers were.  He was fuging dominant. I have watched since the AFL days and seen who there is to see. There are many great WRs over the years. GREAT WRs. Smitty is up there in the game of football. 
    • Smith is clear cut HOF if you judge what he did by reception. Fitzgerald was a stat padder.    The most Steve Smith was ever targeted in his career was in 2005 (150 targets). The same year he wins the triple crown.    Larry Fitzgerald was targeted more than 150 times over 9 separate seasons. Not once eclipsing 1500 yards in a season.    The over glazing of Larry Fitzgerald going around is way over blown. ARZ was top 10 in passing attempts nearly his entire prime. Steve Smith and Andre Johnson had it far worse and would have surpassed his #s in the same situation.
×
×
  • Create New...