Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Purrsuit....


Zod

Recommended Posts

http://www.panthers.com/community/article-2/Panthers-Purrsuit/c1963070-7f80-48e3-8a06-6c39ae9915c0

The Panthers have been in touch with the huddle and are offering us a spot in this event for free.

I need a two person team from the huddle to compete. There are some cool prizes you can win.

Basically you show up at the stadium on Oct 29 at 1:00 and its a city wide scavenger hunt that incorporates new media, so you have to have a smart phone.

Anyone want to represent the huddle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did a similar type scavenger hunt in Wilmington for the Reed's diamond dash. If you are going to take it serious and try to win, you better have your running shoes ready. I thought it would be like a toned down version of the Amazing Race, didn't expect people to matching outfits, and sprint for 2 hours. If it is indeed like the one I did, you will recieve texts on your phone directing you to a location, then receive a question that deals with that location, and you get 3 tries to text in the correct answer. Order of questions was completley random for every team, so it is a matter of luck (i.e. getting clues in locations relatively closer proximity as opposed to getting clues on opposite sides of the area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did a similar type scavenger hunt in Wilmington for the Reed's diamond dash. If you are going to take it serious and try to win, you better have your running shoes ready. I thought it would be like a toned down version of the Amazing Race, didn't expect people to matching outfits, and sprint for 2 hours. If it is indeed like the one I did, you will recieve texts on your phone directing you to a location, then receive a question that deals with that location, and you get 3 tries to text in the correct answer. Order of questions was completley random for every team, so it is a matter of luck (i.e. getting clues in locations relatively closer proximity as opposed to getting clues on opposite sides of the area.

I retract my comment of being interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...